Integration of energy and electron transfer processes in the photosynthetic membrane of Rhodobacter sphaeroides |
| |
Authors: | Michaël L Cartron John D Olsen Melih Sener Philip J Jackson Amanda A Brindley Pu Qian Mark J Dickman Graham J Leggett Klaus Schulten C Neil Hunter |
| |
Institution: | 1. Department of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK;2. Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA;3. Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA;4. ChELSI Institute, Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Sheffield, Mappin Street, Sheffield S1 3JD, UK;5. Department of Chemistry, University of Sheffield, Brook Hill, Sheffield S3 7HF, UK |
| |
Abstract: | Photosynthesis converts absorbed solar energy to a protonmotive force, which drives ATP synthesis. The membrane network of chlorophyll–protein complexes responsible for light absorption, photochemistry and quinol (QH2) production has been mapped in the purple phototrophic bacterium Rhodobacter (Rba.) sphaeroides using atomic force microscopy (AFM), but the membrane location of the cytochrome bc1 (cytbc1) complexes that oxidise QH2 to quinone (Q) to generate a protonmotive force is unknown. We labelled cytbc1 complexes with gold nanobeads, each attached by a Histidine10 (His10)-tag to the C-terminus of cytc1. Electron microscopy (EM) of negatively stained chromatophore vesicles showed that the majority of the cytbc1 complexes occur as dimers in the membrane. The cytbc1 complexes appeared to be adjacent to reaction centre light-harvesting 1-PufX (RC–LH1–PufX) complexes, consistent with AFM topographs of a gold-labelled membrane. His-tagged cytbc1 complexes were retrieved from chromatophores partially solubilised by detergent; RC–LH1–PufX complexes tended to co-purify with cytbc1 whereas LH2 complexes became detached, consistent with clusters of cytbc1 complexes close to RC–LH1–PufX arrays, but not with a fixed, stoichiometric cytbc1–RC–LH1–PufX supercomplex. This information was combined with a quantitative mass spectrometry (MS) analysis of the RC, cytbc1, ATP synthase, cytaa3 and cytcbb3 membrane protein complexes, to construct an atomic-level model of a chromatophore vesicle comprising 67 LH2 complexes, 11 LH1–RC–PufX dimers & 2 RC–LH1–PufX monomers, 4 cytbc1 dimers and 2 ATP synthases. Simulation of the interconnected energy, electron and proton transfer processes showed a half-maximal ATP turnover rate for a light intensity equivalent to only 1% of bright sunlight. Thus, the photosystem architecture of the chromatophore is optimised for growth at low light intensities. |
| |
Keywords: | AFM atomic force microscopy BChl(s) bacteriochlorophyll(s) cyt cytochrome MS mass spectrometry TFA trifluoroacetic acid Rba Rhodobacter LH light-harvesting PFT PeakForce Tapping (AFM) RC Reaction Centre TEM transmission electron microscopy TM Tapping Mode (AFM) NiNTA nickel triacetic acid His Histidine β-DDM β-dodecyl maltoside TDM n-tetradecyl-β-d-maltopyranoside |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|