首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Influence of Lactobacillus spp. from an Inoculant and of Weissella and Leuconostoc spp. from Forage Crops on Silage Fermentation
Authors:Yimin Cai  Yoshimi Benno  Masuhiro Ogawa  Sadahiro Ohmomo  Sumio Kumai  Takashi Nakase
Affiliation:Japan Collection of Microorganisms, The Institute of Physical and Chemical Research, Wako, Saitama 351-0198,1. Kyusyu National Agricultural Experiment Station, Nishigoshi, Kumamoto 861-1192,2. National Institute of Animal Industry, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0901,3. and College of Agriculture, Ehime University, Matsuyama, Ehime 790-8566,4. Japan
Abstract:Lactobacillus spp. from an inoculant and Weissella and Leuconostoc spp. from forage crops were characterized, and their influence on silage fermentation was studied. Forty-two lactic acid-producing cocci were obtained from forage crops and grasses. All isolates were gram-positive, catalase-negative cocci that produced gas from glucose, and produced more than 90% of their lactate in the d-isomer form. These isolates were divided into groups A and B by sugar fermentation patterns. Two representative strains from the two groups, FG 5 and FG 13, were assigned to the species Weissella paramesenteroides and Leuconostoc pseudomesenteroides, respectively, on the basis of DNA-DNA relatedness. Strains FG 5, FG 13, and SL 1 (Lactobacillus casei), isolated from a commercial inoculant, were used as additives to alfalfa and Italian ryegrass silage preparations. Lactic acid bacterium counts were higher in all additive-treated silages than in the control silage at an early stage of ensiling. During silage fermentation, inoculation with SL 1 more effectively inhibited the growth of aerobic bacteria and clostridia than inoculation with strain FG 5 or FG 13. SL 1-treated silages stored well. However, the control and FG 5- and FG 13-treated silages had a significantly (P < 0.05) higher pH and butyric acid and ammonia nitrogen contents and significantly (P < 0.05) lower lactate content than SL 1-treated silage. Compared with the control silage, SL 1 treatments reduced the proportion of d-(−)-lactic acid, gas production, and dry matter loss in two kinds of silage, but the FG 5 and FG 13 treatments gave similar values in alfalfa silages and higher values (P < 0.05) in Italian ryegrass silage. The results confirmed that heterofermentative strains of W. paramesenteroides FG 5 and L. pseudomesenteroides FG 13 did not improve silage quality and may cause some fermentation loss.Silage is now the most common preserved cattle feed in many countries, including Japan. It is well established that lactic acid bacteria (LAB) play an important role in silage fermentation. Epiphytic microflora, the microorganisms naturally present on forage crops, are responsible for silage fermentation and also influence silage quality (3, 11, 15). Lactobacilli and lactic acid-producing cocci, e.g., leuconostocs, lactococci, streptococci, pediococci, and Weissella species, are major components of the microbial flora in various types of forage crops (3). Stirling and Whittenbury (21) reported that leuconostocs were the most numerous and widely distributed on forages and that lactobacilli occurred mostly on grasses. Cai et al. (3) examined a large number of forage crops and grasses and also found that the predominant LAB were lactic acid-producing cocci and that lactobacilli were the least numerous and mostly homofermentative. Ruser (17) found that although all LAB groups were present in chopped-maize samples, homofermentative lactobacilli and heterofermentative leuconostocs were present in the highest numbers.In order to improve silage quality, many LAB-containing biological additives have been developed and are currently available (13, 20, 25). These inoculants may inhibit the growth of harmful bacteria and enhance lactic acid fermentation during ensiling periods. The epiphytic LAB influence the effectiveness of silage inoculants because the introduced bacteria must compete with these LAB (12). Therefore, the LAB species and their characteristics in the silage environment require further study. However, while an increasing number of studies have reported positive benefits from using some bacterial inoculants as silage additives, relatively few have reported the effect of epiphytic LAB, especially Leuconostoc and Weissella species, on silage fermentation. In the present study, the characterization of Leuconostoc and Weissella species isolated from forage crops and their influence on silage fermentation were examined.
Keywords:
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号