首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Losses of particulate N during filtration and handling of feed and rumen incubation residues
Institution:1. Department of Animal Nutrition and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, S-753 23 Uppsala, Sweden;2. Faculty of Agriculture, Latvia University of Agriculture, Liela Street 2, Jelgava LV-3001, Latvia;1. Department of Animal Nutrition, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Wołyńska 33, 60-637 Poznań, Poland;2. Department of Preclinical Sciences and Infectious Diseases, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Wołyńska 35, 60-637 Poznań, Poland;3. University Center for Veterinary Medicine, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Szydłowska 43, 60-637 Poznań, Poland;4. Centre for Biosciences, Institute of Animal Physiology, Soltesovej 4-6, 040-01 Kosice, Slovak Republic;5. Faculty of Agriculture, Institute of Animal Sciences, Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, Liela Street 2, LV-3001 Jelgava, Latvia;6. Department of Animal Nutrition, West Bengal University of Animal and Fishery Sciences, 37 K. B. Sarani, Kolkata, India;7. American Institute for Goat Research, Langston University, Langston, OK 73050, USA;8. Department of Dairy Science, National Research Centre, 33 Bohouth St., Dokki, Giza 12622, Egypt;1. Department of Agriculture, Nutrition and Food Systems, University of New Hampshire, Durham 03824;2. Department of Earth Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755
Abstract:Unintended losses of feed N occur during filtration procedures in the laboratory as well as during washing of in sacco residues and other procedures to remove microbial contamination. Our aim was to find the most reliable method for recovery of buffer and neutral detergent (ND) insoluble N (BIN and NDIN, respectively) in feed residues. In Experiment 1, paper filtration (PF; 20–25 μm retention) and sintered glass crucible filtration (GF; 40–90 μm retention) and centrifugation at 3000×g (LSC) were compared for recovery and loss of feed N after feeds were incubated with a borate–phosphate buffer or ND. The same ND removal techniques and centrifugation at 5000×g (HSC) were also applied to in vitro-fermented residues. In Experiment 2a, in vitro fermentation residues were transferred to in sacco bags (28 μm pore openings), washed, extracted with ND using GF or LSC techniques to remove detergents. In 2b, the in vitro residues were homogenised, stomached and/or centrifuged in different ways, then extracted with ND using HSC to remove ND. The NDIN was assumed to exclude microbial N. Samples used in Experiments 1 and 2a consisted of two grasses, birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus), wheat bran, rapeseed cake (RSC), dried distillers grain with solubles from wheat (DDGS), de-hulled barley grain (barley) and solvent extracted soybean meal (SBM). For Experiment 2b, we used only one grass and barley. Highest recovery of BIN was by PF > GF > LSC, whereas NDIN recovery was highest for LSC with no differences between filtration techniques for most feeds. After in vitro fermentation, recovery of NDIN was 1.2–7.1- and 1.2–2.8-fold higher by LSC versus GF and PF, respectively. Washing of in vitro residues in sacco caused NDIN reductions of up to 0.35 and 0.85 when GF or LSC was used to remove ND. Losses of NDIN from in vitro fermented feeds, including in sacco and GF losses after ND extraction, were 0.64–0.70 in forage, and 0.81 and 0.83 in SBM and DDGS, respectively. Losses of NDIN from homogenisation, pummelling and centrifugation of in vitro residue were smaller (0.02–0.42) than after sample washing in sacco bags. Oven drying of in vitro residues at 65 °C prior to ND extraction inflated NDIN values and must be avoided. A higher centrifugal force, i.e., 5000×g instead of 3000×g and fewer centrifugations (three instead of five) resulted in the highest recovery and are recommended to minimise sample losses during centrifugation of in vitro residues.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号