Serological and conductimetric assays for the detection of Pseudomonas syringae pathovar pisi in pea seeds

Test protocols for detecting Pseudomonas syringae pv. pisi , the causal agent of bacterial blight, in pea seeds are generally based on dilution-plating assays. These assays are usually very specific and reliable, but are time-consuming and laborious. Tests suited for large scale screening of seed lots are therefore needed. Conductimetric assays, immunofluorescence microscopy (IF) and an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for detecting Ps. syr. pv. pisi in pea seed extracts were compared with dilution-plating by two extraction methods, viz. 6 h soaking of seeds and 2 h soaking of flour of ground pea seeds in water. In general, the detection of Ps. syr. pv. pisi with conductimetric, IF and dilution-plating assays in the suspension water of the ground and 2 h-soaked pea samples was less sensitive than detection in suspension water of the 6 h-soaked pea seeds. The detection threshold of these assays varied per seed lot between 0 and 4.08 log cfu ml^-1 for the 6 h soaking procedure. The detection threshold of ELISA varied for both extraction methods generally between 4.08 and 6.08 log cfu ml^-1. Detection times recorded in conductimetric assays correlated well (— 0.89 < r < —0.98) with the log colony-forming units of Ps. syr. pv. pisi added to seed extracts at 27 as well as 17°. However, confirmation of results by isolation on semi-selective media after conductimetry was more successful at 17° than at 27°, because of the relatively lower activity of saprophytic Pseudomonas spp. at this temperature.