Experiments on factors influencing settlement,survival, and growth of two species of barnacles in new south wales

Adult Tesseropora rosea (Krauss) and Tetraclitella purpurascens (Wood) are mostly found in the eulittoral (barnacle) zone of rocky seashores in New South Wales. Below this zone most space is occupied by the tube-worm Galeolaria caespitosa (Lamarck) or by various species of macroalgae. Within the eulittoral zone, T. rosea are mostly on sunny areas of rock exposed to relatively strong wave-action. T. purpurascens are present mainly in crevices, caves, and under ledges where there is considerable shade.Cyprids of both species settled on sandstone plates and on experimentally cleared areas in the barnacle and Galeolaria zones. Neither species settled where the substratum was already covered by algae or Galeolaria. No spat of T. purpurascens were found in sunny areas of the barnacle zone. T. rosea, however, settled in cleared substrata in sunny and shaded areas. Neither species settled in the littoral fringe above the upper limit of distribution of adults. On boulders transferred to high levels of the shore during a storm, small T. purpurascens died within a few weeks.Barnacles of both species which had settled in experimentally cleared areas in the Galeolaria zone survived and grew. In these areas some T. purpurascens were killed by being smothered by tube-worms which settled after the barnacles. This probably happens to T. rosea, but was not demonstrated experimentally. In the Galeolaria zone, both species of barnacles were very quickly smothered and killed by macroalgae growing over them, except where these were experimentally removed.Within the barnacle zone, all newly-settled spat of T. purpurascens transferred to sunny sites died within two months, whilst many of those in shaded sites survived. In areas where wave-action was strong, spat of T. rosea survived and grew well in sunny areas, but survived better in the shade. Under a ledge, however, where wave-action was reduced, all the T. rosea in sunny sites, and most of those in shaded sites died within two months; many newly-settled T. purpurascens survived in the shade in this area.The grazing limpet Cellana tramoserica (Sowerby) dislodged and crushed some newly-settled T. rosea and reduced survival in some sunny areas. T. rosea settled preferentially on bare rock and were rarely found on the shells of adult barnacles. Thus, the density of spat was greater where adult barnacles were absent. In contrast, many newly-settled T. purpurascens were found on the shells of adults of their own species in shaded areas; they also settled on cleared rock. Because T. purpurascens tended to settle amongst and on adults, and in crevices and confined areas, they were not much affected by limpets. When newly-settled T. purpurascens were in high densities, they had lower survival than in areas with reduced densities, because of squashing and smothering by each other.The upper and lower limits of vertical distribution (zonation) of these two species of barnacles are determined primarily by the settlement of cyprids. Neither species settled at the highest levels on the shore. Whether this was due to the decreasing time of submersion during high tide towards the top of the shore, or a result of preferences for settlement site is unknown. Even if cyprids were to settle in the littoral fringe, the spat would die very quickly probably as a result of desiccation. Below the barnacle zone, the entire substratum is usually occupied by other sessile species, particularly macroalgae, on which the barnacles do not settle. In experimentally cleared areas below the barnacle zone, or in any naturally cleared areas both species settled, and could survive the physical conditions. Newly-settled spat were, however, overgrown and killed by algae and Galeolaria.Within the barnacle zone, T. purpurascens is restricted to shaded areas because of the inability of newly-settled spat to survive the physical stresses of high temperature and desiccation in sunny habitats. T. rosea appears to be excluded from shaded areas by a combination of the lack of suitable substrata on which to settle, and the effects of reduced water-flow in many crevices and under ledges. T. rosea survived better in areas with strong wave-action and can survive in shaded areas where water-flow is not reduced by the topography of the substratum.