Cellular interactions in lymphocyte proliferation: effect of syngeneic and xenogeneic macrophages.

Secondary cell-mediated responses to ectromelia virus infection were studied using an in vitro system. Lymphoid “responder” cells from mice which had recovered from intravenous primary infection at various times prior to sacrifice, were cultured with syngeneic, virus-infected macrophages or spleen cells as “stimulator” cells at 39 °C, a temperature which prevented the virus from exerting cytopathic effects against responder cells. This restrictive temperature and medium with 2-mercaptoethanol at 10^?4M often gave viable cell yields of more than 100% of the original responder cells over 4 days of culture. Preliminary experiments showed that spleen cells from primed mice, cultured with syngeneic, infected spleen cells from normal mice gave the most powerful secondary cytotoxic cell responses as measured by ⁵¹Cr release from virusinfected H-2-compatible target cells. The cytotoxic cells were sensitive to anti-θ and complement treatment and lysed H-2-compatible, virus-infected target cells much more efficiently than infected, allogeneic target cells, thus indicating that they were T cells. Some activity against uninfected H-2-compatible target cells was also generated, but this was largely independent of the presence of virus-induced antigen, (i.e. infected stimulator cells were unnecessary) and therefore seemed to be a consequence of the cultural conditions. Cold target competition showed that this activity was the responsibility of a T cell subset separate from the virus-specific cytotoxic T cells. The peak of cytotoxic activity against virus-infected targets occurred at 4 days of culture and DNA synthesis was maximal on day 3. The concentration of cytotoxic T cells at the peak was eight-fold higher than at the peak of the splenic primary response in vivo, Memory T cells (precursors of secondary cytotoxic T cells) appeared in spleen within 12–14 days of primary infection in vivo, reached a plateau at 5–6 weeks and persisted for at least 16 months. Spleen cells appeared partly refractory to secondary stimulation in vitro at 8–10 days post-priming. This did not seem to be due to cellular migration from spleen to lymph nodes or peritoneal cavity, but its cause was not determined. Primary responses in vitro were not detectable under conditions optimal for secondary responses, thus suggesting a major quantitative, or qualitative difference between virgin and memory T cells.