Multivariate stabilizing sexual selection and the evolution of male and female genital morphology in the red flour beetle* |
| |
Authors: | Clarissa House Philip Tunstall James Rapkin Mathilda J. Bale Matthew Gage Enrique del Castillo John Hunt |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. School of Science and Health and Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Richmond, NSW, 2753 Australia;2. Centre for Ecology and Conservation, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Cornwall, TR10 9EZ United Kingdom;3. School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ United Kingdom;4. Department of Industrial Engineering and Department of Statistics, Pennsylvania State University, State College, Pennsylvania, 16802;5. School of Science and Health and Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Richmond, NSW, 2753 Australia Centre for Ecology and Conservation, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Cornwall, TR10 9EZ United Kingdom |
| |
Abstract: | Male genitals are highly divergent in animals with internal fertilization. Most studies attempting to explain this diversity have focused on testing the major hypotheses of genital evolution (the lock-and-key, pleiotropy, and sexual selection hypotheses), and quantifying the form of selection targeting male genitals has played an important role in this endeavor. However, we currently know far less about selection targeting female genitals or how male and female genitals interact during mating. Here, we use formal selection analysis to show that genital size and shape is subject to strong multivariate stabilizing sexual selection in both sexes of the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum. Moreover, we show significant sexual selection on the covariance between the sexes for specific aspects of genital shape suggesting that male and female genitalia also interact to determine the successful transfer of a spermatophore during mating. Our work therefore highlights the important role that both male and female genital morphologies play in determining mating success and that these effects can occur independently, as well as through their interaction. Moreover, it cautions against the overly simplistic view that the sexual selection targeting genital morphology will always be directional in form and restricted primarily to males. |
| |
Keywords: | Fitness peak genitals lock-and-key hypothesis selection analysis |
|
|