Formal taxa, species groups, and perception of the genus Diplodactylus (Reptilia: Gekkonidae)

Genera with large numbers of species present particular difficulties; the analysis of relationships, of included taxa may be roblematic. One attempt to aproach this problem involves the reco of clusters of species tIat may be informally assembgd into species groups. The problems tE:g the recognition of such assemblages may induce are exlored. It is not that the species groups, as originail formulated, are problematic as they are initiafy erected to demarcate clusters withm an imperfectly known phylogeny of a supposedly monophyletic group. These species groups, however, tend to become recognized as “taxa” rather than operationaf clusters and as such tend to influence the approach to the inclusive taxon taken by subsequent workers. Rather than testing the concept of the species grous, there is a tendency to retain them and to insert other groups between them that do not exactly fit the original scheme. The establishment of species groups, first used to clarify a complex situation, has teen a source of problems for subseuent workers. The history of this aproach is traced for the gekkonid genus Diplodactylus and the problems that have arisen are outlined.