首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


A biochemical and physicochemical comparison of two recombinant enzymes used for enzyme replacement therapies of hunter syndrome
Authors:Yo Kyung Chung  Young Bae Sohn  Jong Mun Sohn  Jieun Lee  Mi Sun Chang  Younghee Kwun  Chi Hwa Kim  Jin Young Lee  Yeon Joo Yook  Ah-Ra Ko  Dong-Kyu Jin
Affiliation:1. Department of Molecular Science and Technology, Ajou University, Suwon, South Korea
2. Bioprocess Engineering, Central Research Center, Green Cross Corporation, Yongin, South Korea
3. Department of Medical Genetics, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, South Korea
4. Department of Pediatrics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 50 Irwon-dong, Gangnam-ku, 135-710, Seoul, South Korea
5. Rare Diesase Team, Mogam Biotechnology Research Institute, Yongin, South Korea
6. Clinical Research Center, Samsung Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul, South Korea
Abstract:Mucopolysaccharidosis II (MPS II, Hunter syndrome; OMIM 309900) is an X-linked lysosomal storage disease caused by a deficiency in the enzyme iduronate-2-sulfatase (IDS), leading to accumulation of glycosaminoglycans (GAGs). For enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) of Hunter syndrome, two recombinant enzymes, idursulfase (Elaprase®, Shire Human Genetic Therapies, Lexington, MA) and idursulfase beta (Hunterase®, Green Cross Corporation, Yongin, Korea), are currently available in Korea. To compare the biochemical and physicochemical differences between idursulfase and idursulfase beta, we examined the formylglycine (FGly) content, specific enzyme activity, mannose-6-phosphate (M6P) content, sialic acid content, and in vitro cell uptake activity of normal human fibroblasts of these two enzymes. The FGly content, which determines the enzyme activity, of idursulfase beta was significantly higher than that of idursulfase (79.4?±?0.9 vs. 68.1?±?2.2 %, P?P?in vitro showed a significant difference (Kuptake, 5.09?±?0.96 vs. 6.50?±?1.28 nM protein, P?=?0.017). In conclusion, idursulfase beta exhibited significantly higher specific enzyme activity than idursulfase, resulting from higher FGly content. These biochemical differences may be partly attributed to clinical efficacy. However, long-term clinical evaluations of Hunter syndrome patients treated with these two enzymes will be needed to demonstrate the clinical implications of significant difference of the enzyme activity and the FGly content.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号