首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


The evolving copiotrophic/oligotrophic dichotomy: From Winogradsky to physiology and genomics
Authors:Alfonso Soler-Bistué  Luciana L Couso  Ignacio E Sánchez
Institution:1. Instituto de Investigaciones Biotecnológicas Dr. Rodolfo A. Ugalde, CONICET, Universidad Nacional de San Martín, San Martín, Argentina;2. Cátedra de Genética, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Contribution: Conceptualization (equal), Data curation (equal), Formal analysis (equal), Funding acquisition (equal), ?Investigation (equal), Methodology (equal), Project administration (equal), Writing - original draft (supporting), Writing - review & editing (supporting);3. Laboratorio de Fisiología de Proteínas, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Instituto de Química Biológica de la Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (IQUIBICEN), Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Abstract:Nearly 100 years ago, Winogradsky published a classic communication in which he described two groups of microbes, zymogenic and autochthonous. When organic matter penetrates the soil, zymogenic microbes quickly multiply and degrade it, then giving way to the slow combustion of autochthonous microbes. Although the text was originally written in French, it is often cited by English-speaking authors. We undertook a complete translation of the 1924 publication, which we provide as Supporting information. Here, we introduce the translation and describe how the zymogenic/autochthonous dichotomy shaped research questions in the study of microbial diversity and physiology. We also identify in the literature three additional and closely related dichotomies, which we propose to call exclusive copiotrophs/oligotrophs, coexisting copiotrophs/oligotrophs and fast-growing/slow-growing microbes. While Winogradsky focussed on a successional view of microbial populations over time, the current discussion is focussed on the differences in the specific growth rate of microbes as a function of the concentration of a given limiting substrate. In the future, it will be relevant to keep in mind both nutrient-focussed and time-focussed microbial dichotomies and to design experiments with both isolated laboratory cultures and multi-species communities in the spirit of Winogradsky's direct method.
Keywords:
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号