首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Effects of flow on meiofauna colonization in artificial streams and reference sites within the Illinois River, Arkansas
Authors:Freese Smith  Arthur V Brown
Institution:(1) Department of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA;(2) Department of Natural Sciences, Northeastern State University, 611 North Grand, Tahlequah, OK 74464, USA
Abstract:Despite frequent disturbances from flow, stream meiofauna form diverse and abundant assemblages suggesting that they are resistant and/or resilient to flow disturbances. Stream flow profoundly influences benthic invertebrate communities but these effects remain poorly understood. We examined the influence of flow on meiofauna colonization at small spatial scales (2–3 m) using artificial streams in conjunction with similar sites (flow, depth, substrates) in the reference stream (Illinois River, Arkansas). Colonization of meiofauna was found to be rapid and generally increased with flow rates examined (1–2, 6–7, and 11–12 cm s−1). Six of the 10 most abundant taxa successfully completed colonization in artificial channels (equaled or exceeded reference benthic densities) within 5 days. Benthic meiofauna were more abundant in fast flows in artificial channels and in fast and slow flows in reference stream sites. A diverse assemblage of meiofauna was collected from the plankton which was dominated by rotifers, copepods (mostly nauplii), dipterans, and cladocerans. Densities of drifting meiofauna (potential colonists of the benthos) were low (5 no. l−1) and similar among artificial channels and reference sites regardless of flow rates (F 1,18 = 2.19, p = 0.1407). Although densities were low, the numbers of drifting meiofauna were more than sufficient to colonize the benthos. Less than 0.65% of the drifting meiofauna were needed to colonize the substrates of artificial streams. The benthic assemblage paralleled that of the plankton, consisting mainly of rotifers, copepods (mainly nauplii), and dipterans. Evidence for active control over dispersal was observed as meiofauna densities varied between the plankton and benthos over the diel cycle (F 1,18 = 6.02, p = 0.0001 and F 1,18 = 9.88, p = 0.006, respectively). Rotifers, copepods, and nematodes were more abundant in the plankton during the day and in the substrates at night. These results suggest that meiofauna assemblages can change rapidly in response to alterations of habitat patches by disturbance.
Keywords:meiofauna  colonization  benthic  drift  artificial streams  stream
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号