Long tree‐ring chronologies reveal 20th century increases in water‐use efficiency but no enhancement of tree growth at five Iberian pine forests

We investigated the tree growth and physiological response of five pine forest stands in relation to changes in atmospheric CO₂ concentration (c_a) and climate in the Iberian Peninsula using annually resolved width and δ¹³C tree‐ring chronologies since ad 1600. ¹³C discrimination (Δ≈c_i/c_a), leaf intercellular CO₂ concentration (c_i) and intrinsic water‐use efficiency (iWUE) were inferred from δ¹³C values. The most pronounced changes were observed during the second half of the 20th century, and differed between stands. Three sites kept a constant c_i/c_a ratio, leading to significant c_i and iWUE increases (active response to c_a); whereas a significant increase in c_i/c_a resulted in the lowest iWUE increase of all stands at a relict Pinus uncinata forest site (passive response to c_a). A significant decrease in c_i/c_a led to the greatest iWUE improvement at the northwestern site. We tested the climatic signal strength registered in the δ¹³C series after removing the low‐frequency trends due to the physiological responses to increasing c_a. We found stronger correlations with temperature during the growing season, demonstrating that the physiological response to c_a changes modulated δ¹³C and masked the climate signal. Since 1970 higher δ¹³C values revealed iWUE improvements at all the sites exceeding values expected by an active response to the c_a increase alone. These patterns were related to upward trends in temperatures, indicating that other factors are reinforcing stomatal closure in these forests. Narrower rings during the second half of the 20th century than in previous centuries were observed at four sites and after 1970 at all sites, providing no evidence for a possible CO₂‘fertilization’ effect on growth. The iWUE improvements found for all the forests, reflecting both a c_a rise and warmer conditions, seem to be insufficient to compensate for the negative effects of the increasing water limitation on growth.