Phylogenetic context and Basal metazoan model systems |
| |
Authors: | Collins Allen G Cartwright Paulyn McFadden Catherine S Schierwater Bernd |
| |
Institution: | 1 ITZ, Ecology & Evolution, TiHo Hannover, Bünteweg 17d, D-30559 Hannover, Germany
2 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, 1200 Sunnyside Ave, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045
3 Biology and Department, 1250 N. Dartmouth Ave., Harvey Mudd College, Claremont, California 91711 |
| |
Abstract: | In comparative studies using model organisms, extant taxa areoften referred to as basal. The term suggests that such taxaare descendants of lineages that diverged early in the historyof some larger taxon. By this usage, the basal metazoans comprisejust four phyla (Placozoa, Porifera, Cnidaria, and Ctenophora)and the large clade Bilateria. We advise against this practicebecause basal refers to a region at the base or root of a phylogenetictree. Thus, referring to an extant taxon or species as basal,or as more basal than another, can be misleading. While muchprogress has been made toward understanding some of the phylogeneticrelationships within these groups, the relationships among themare still largely not known with certainty. Thus, sound inferencesfrom comparative studies of model organisms demand continuedillumination of phylogeny. Hypotheses about the mechanisms underlyingmetazoan evolution can be drawn from the study of model organismsin Cnidaria, Ctenophora, Placozoa, and Porifera, but it is clearthat these model organisms are likely to be derived in manyrespects. Therefore, testing these hypotheses requires the studyof yet additional model organisms. The most effective testsare those that investigate model organisms with phylogeneticpositions among two sister groups comprising a larger cladeof interest. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 PubMed Oxford 等数据库收录! |
|