Interactions in hypoxic and hypercapnic breathing are genetically linked to mouse chromosomes 1 and 5. |
| |
Authors: | Clarke G Tankersley Karl W Broman |
| |
Affiliation: | Department of Environmental Health Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. |
| |
Abstract: | The genetic basis for differences in the regulation of breathing is certainly multigenic. The present paper builds on a well-established genetic model of differences in breathing using inbred mouse strains. We tested the interactive effects of hypoxia and hypercapnia in two strains of mice known for variation in hypercapnic ventilatory sensitivity (HCVS); i.e., high gain in C57BL/6J (B6) and low gain in C3H/HeJ (C3) mice. Strain differences in the magnitude and pattern of breathing were measured during normoxia [inspired O(2) fraction (Fi(O(2))) = 0.21] and hypoxia (Fi(O(2)) = 0.10) with mild or severe hypercapnia (inspired CO(2) fraction = 0.03 or 0.08) using whole body plethysmography. At each level of Fi(O(2)), the change in minute ventilation (Ve) from 3 to 8% CO(2) was computed, and the strain differences between B6 and C3 mice in HCVS were maintained. Inheritance patterns showed potentiation effects of hypoxia on HCVS (i.e., CO(2) potentiation) unique to the B6C3F1/J offspring of B6 and C3 progenitors; i.e., the change in Ve from 3 to 8% CO(2) was significantly greater (P < 0.01) with hypoxia relative to normoxia in F1 mice. Linkage analysis using intercross progeny (F2; n = 52) of B6 and C3 progenitors revealed two significant quantitative trait loci associated with variable HCVS phenotypes. After normalization for body weight, variation in Ve responses during 8% CO(2) in hypoxia was linked to mouse chromosome 1 (logarithm of the odds ratio = 4.4) in an interval between 68 and 89 cM (i.e., between D1Mit14 and D1Mit291). The second quantitative trait loci linked differences in CO(2) potentiation to mouse chromosome 5 (logarithm of the odds ratio = 3.7) in a region between 7 and 29 cM (i.e., centered at D5Mit66). In conclusion, these results support the hypothesis that a minimum of two significant genes modulate the interactive effects of hypoxia and hypercapnia in this genetic model. |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|