Patch use, apprehension, and vigilance behavior of Nubian Ibex under perceived risk of predation

Foraging theory predicts that animals will sacrifice feedingeffort in order to reduce predation risk. Once a forager choosesa habitat, it must decide how to allocate its foraging effort.Nubian Ibex are diurnal, social, cliff-dwelling herbivores.Many of their characteristics seem to have evolved as responsesto predation risk. In order to assess the effects that perceivedrisk of predation might have on foraging behavior of free-rangingNubian Ibex in the Negev Desert, Israel, we measured giving-updensities (GUDs) in artificial food patches and used them togauge apprehension level. (Apprehension can be defined as areduction in attention devoted to performing an activity asa consequence of reallocating attention to detecting or respondingto predation risk. A forager can also be vigilant. Vigilanceis often defined as time spent scanning the surroundings withthe head up.) We also quantified time budgeting using focalobservation of individual Nubian Ibex. Habitat preferences andpatch selectivity as a measure of apprehension were considered.In particular, we tested the effect of distance from refugeon GUDs, the effect of micropatch structure on selectivity,and the effect of distance from the refuge and group size onNubian Ibex vigilance level and apprehension. Nubian Ibex allocatetheir foraging effort more toward patches closer to the escapeterrain. At the same time, Nubian Ibex are more apprehensiveat intermediate distances from the cliff edge than nearer thecliff, and their use of vigilance increases with distance fromthe cliff edge. These results suggest that Nubian Ibex may switchfrom apprehension to a more extreme behavior of vigilance atgreater distances from the refuge. This study demonstrated theuse of antipredatory behaviors, apprehension, and vigilanceby a forager. Estimating apprehension and vigilance levels ofa forager simultaneously gives a more complete and accuratepicture of how the habitat is perceived by them and combinedwith measurements of GUD allow a more accurate assessment ofhabitat quality.