Long-term effects of boron and copper on phenolics and monoterpenes in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) needles

Backgroud and aims

Plant boron (B) status is known to affect plant secondary metabolites but most studies have been short termed and in controlled environments. Copper (Cu) effects on phenolics are better known at toxic than at low levels. Here, the chemistry of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) needles was studied 20 years after fertilisation with B and Cu in a long-term field experiment on a drained boreal peatland.

Methods

Phenolic compounds were analysed from three needle year classes using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and condensed tannins with modified acid-butanol assay. Monoterpenes in the youngest needles were analysed by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS).

Results

Needle B concentrations were at deficient level in controls (5.7 μg g^?1), but at the optimum level (12 μg g^?1) still 20 years after fertilisation. Copper concentrations were low but not deficient (4.0 μg g^?1 in unfertilised, 4.8 μg g^?1 in fertilised). Needle ageing increased the concentrations of individual phenolics in most cases, but decreased the concentration of condensed tannins. The concentrations of several individual phenolics were reduced by B fertilisation compared to B-deficient control, significantly in the cases of (+)-catechin and a neolignan. The concentrations of eight compounds and the sum of small-molecule phenolics were higher in Cu fertilised trees. Condensed tannins and monoterpenes were not affected by the micronutrients.

Conclusions

Boron and copper additions affected mostly the same phenolic compounds, but B decreased while Cu increased their concentrations, Cu effects being clearer. The higher phenolic concentrations in B deficient trees were not likely large enough to explain leader dieback in B-deficient trees. The effects and interactions of these micronutrients need to be further studied in field conditions to establish firstly if the changes in phenolics are consistent among species, and secondly what mechanisms lead to the changes. Although small, the changes in phenolic concentrations may affect the interactions of the trees with their biotic and abiotic environment, when consistent over many years.