Potential Conflicts of Interest of Editorial Board Members from Five Leading Spine Journals |
| |
| Authors: | Stein J. Janssen Annelien L. Bredenoord Wouter Dhert Marinus de Kleuver F. Cumhur Oner Jorrit-Jan Verlaan |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. Department of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.; 2. Department of Medical Humanities, Julius Center, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.; 3. Department of Orthopaedics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.; Rega Institute for Medical Research, BELGIUM, |
| |
| Abstract: | Conflicts of interest arising from ties between pharmaceutical industry and physicians are common and may bias research. The extent to which these ties exist among editorial board members of medical journals is not known. This study aims to determine the prevalence and financial magnitude of potential conflicts of interest among editorial board members of five leading spine journals. The editorial boards of: The Spine Journal; Spine; European Spine Journal; Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine; and Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques were extracted on January 2013 from the journals’ websites. Disclosure statements were retrieved from the 2013 disclosure index of the North American Spine Society; the program of the 20th International Meeting on Advanced Spine Techniques; the program of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Scoliosis Research Society; the program of the AOSpine global spine congress; the presentations of the 2013 Annual Eurospine meeting; and the disclosure index of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Names of the editorial board members were compared with the individuals who completed a disclosure for one of these indexes. Disclosures were extracted when full names matched. Two hundred and ten (29%) of the 716 identified editorial board members reported a potential conflict of interest and 154 (22%) reported nothing to disclose. The remaining 352 (49%) editorial board members had no disclosure statement listed for one of the indexes. Eighty-nine (42%) of the 210 editorial board members with a potential conflict of interest reported a financial relationship of more than $10,000 during the prior year. This finding confirms that potential conflicts of interest exist in editorial boards which might influence the peer review process and can result in bias. Academia and medical journals in particular should be aware of this and strive to improve transparency of the review process. We emphasize recommendations that contribute to achieving this goal. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
|
|
