Nonmarine aspects of the Cambrian Tonto Group of the Grand Canyon, USA, and broader implications

A re-examination of the classic time-transgressive model of the Cambrian Tonto Group of the Grand Canyon challenges some of the basic assumptions regarding strandline migration during the Sauk transgression, the applicability of sequence stratigraphy to epicratonic deposits, and the criteria by which siliciclastic deposits of the North American Cambrian system are categorized as marine. Indicators for high short-term depositional rates, coupled with the complex splay and coalescence of meter-scale parasequence architectures, detract from the shoreline migration and deepening seas model that has held sway for over 60 years. Ostensibly marine signatures, represented by sparse and fragmentary trilobite fossils and abundant bedding plane trace fossils, are closely associated with nonmarine signatures, represented by nonmarine palynoflora and clay mineral assemblages, and highly oxidized paleoweathering profiles. The vast extent of three-dimensional exposure of the Cambrian section in the Grand Canyon shows a paleogeography not of a single discrete shoreline translated laterally with rising and falling sea-level, but of a single mosaic setting of emergent shoals and rocky peaks, broad fluvial and tidal channels, and shallow pools and interchannel flats. Much detail concerning sediment dynamics and paleoenvironment is lost or overlooked when summary terms like “marginal marine” or “nearshore” are applied to such settings. It is suggested here that the Tonto Group, with its mixed marine and nonmarine attributes, and considering its historic role as a teaching model, be viewed not as an exceptional Cambrian deposit, but as an exemplar of epicratonic deposits on a pre-vegetated landscape.