Macrophyte-gastropod associations: observations and experiments on macrophyte choice by gastropods

SUMMARY.

• 1 The abundance and microdistribution of thirteen gastropod and ten macrophyte species were monitored over 2 years in a 1 ha shallow eutrophic pond near Oxford, England. While areas of allochthonous leaf litter supported a depauperate and nondistinctive gastropod fauna, three different macrophyte habitats supported more diverse and distinctive assemblages of gastropods.
• 2 Most gastropod species were clearly more abundant (number m^-2pond bottom) on one macrophyte type than on other substrates. One exception, the limpet Acroloxus lacustris (Linn.) was abundantion both the water lily Nymphaea alba L. and on emergent macrophyles. Planorbis vortex (Linn.) was associated with graminoid emergent macropytes, especially Glyceria maxima (Hartm.) Holmberg, while Lymnaea peregra (Mull.) was associated with submersed macrophytes, perhaps more particularly with Elodea canadensis Michx.
• 3 The association of, 4. lacuxtris with N. alba and emergent macrophytes is perhaps explained by constraints of the morphology of the limpet requiring a relatively broad smooth substrate for attachment and locomotion.
• 4 The reason for the associations of P. vortex with G. maxima, and of L. peregra with E.canadensis are less obvious. Experiments giving each snail species a choice between the two macrophytes showed that P. vortex regularly exhibited a preference for G. maxima but failed to reveal substrate selection by L. peregra. Neither snail species affected the macrophyte choice of the other. The results suggested that L. peregra did not behave naturally in experiments.
• 5 The preference for G, maxima by P. vortex was not affected by prior conditioning of the plant by the snail, but was affected by the emergent nature of G. maxima and by the presence/absence of a natural periphyton assemblage and associated detritus.
• 6 The distribution of A. lacustris is probably determined by the physical structure of the substrate, while that of P. vortex is determined by the presence and quality of epiphytic periphyton-detritus. The observations and experiments with L. peregra reported here leave the reasons for its distribution in doubt.