| Abstract: | Groups of Israeli and Australian science educationists, practising secondary school science teachers, practising scientists, and science graduates preparing to become science teachers were questioned as to the suitability of teleologically and anthropomorphically formulated statements for inclusion in fourth/fifth-form (14–16 year olds) level study material. Respondents' awareness of the dangers involved (i.e. literal acceptance by pupils of such statements) was acute in the science educationist group, but progressively less so with the teachers, the scientists, and the prospective teachers. It was recommended that all persons connected with science teaching become more aware of the problem, in particular persons engaged in teacher training, and those responsible for preparing texts. |
