首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Monte Carlo study of the influence of energy spectra,mesh size,high Z element on dose and PVDR based on 1-D and 3-D heterogeneous mouse head phantom for Microbeam Radiation Therapy
Affiliation:1. Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven/KU Leuven, Belgium;2. Respiratory Oncology (Pneumology), University Hospitals Leuven/KU Leuven, Belgium;3. Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO Clinic), GROW, Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands;4. Pulmonology, Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands;5. Thoracic Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven/KU Leuven, Belgium;6. Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven/KU Leuven, Belgium;7. Nuclear Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven/KU Leuven, Belgium;1. Radiology Department, Sunderland Royal Hospital, Kayll Road, Sunderland, SR4 7TP, UK;2. Teesside University, Middlesbrough, TS1 3BA, UK;2. Holy Redeemer Hospital, Bott Cancer Center, Meadowbrook, PA;3. Packard Lab, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA;1. Department of Cardiology, University of Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany;2. Department of Radiology, University of Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany;1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, South Korea;2. Department of Nuclear Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, South Korea;3. Division of Cancer Epidemiology & Genetics, National Cancer Institute, MD 20892-9760, USA
Abstract:PurposeTo evaluate the influence of energy spectra, mesh sizes, high Z element on dose and PVDR in Microbeam Radiation Therapy (MRT) based on 1-D analogy-mouse-head-model (1-D MHM) and 3-D voxel-mouse-head-phantom (3-D VMHP) by Monte Carlo simulation.MethodsA Microbeam-Array-Source-Model was implemented into EGSnrc/DOSXYZnrc. The microbeam size is assumed to be 25 μm, 50 μm or 75 μm in thickness and fixed 1 mm in height with 200 μm c-t-c. The influence of the energy spectra of ID17@ESRF and BMIT@CLS were investigated. The mesh size was optimized. PVDR in 1-D MHM and 3-D VMHP was compared with the homogeneous water phantom. The arc influence of 3-D VMHP filled with water (3-D VMHWP) was compared with the rectangle phantom.ResultsPVDR of the lower BMIT@CLS spectrum is 2.4 times that of ID17@ESRF for lower valley dose. The optimized mesh is 5 µm for 25 µm, and 10 µm for 50 µm and 75 µm microbeams with 200 µm c-t-c. A 500 μm skull layer could make PVDR difference up to 62.5% for 1-D MHM. However this influence is limited (<5%) for the farther homogeneous media (e.g. 600 µm). The peak dose uniformity of 3-D VMHP at the same depth could be up to 8% for 1.85 mm × 1 mm irradiation field, whereas that of 3-D VMHWP is <1%. The high Z element makes the dose uniformity enhance in target. The surface arc could affect the superficial PVDR (from 44% to 21% in 0.2 mm depth), whereas this influence is limited for the more depth (<1%).ConclusionAn accurate MRT dose calculation algorithm should include the influence of 3-D heterogeneous media.
Keywords:Microbeam Radiation Therapy  Monte Carlo method  Realistic mouse head phantom  Heterogeneous media
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号