Laser-evoked potentials: exogenous and endogenous components

The aim of this study was to distinguish the exogenous component (related to the physical properties of the stimulus) and the endogenous component (reflecting event-related cognitive processing) of the laser-evoked potential (LEP). Short painful radiant heat pulses generated by a CO₂-laser were applied to the dorsum of the right and left foot. LEPs were recorded with 5 scalp electrodes in the midline versus linked earlobes in 26 healthy subjects. In order to identify the exogenous component, the LEP was recorded during a standardised distraction task (reading a short story). To identify the endogenous component P3 for the LEP, a 2-stimulus oddball paradigm was used (20% probability of targets). When the task of the oddball paradigm consisted of pressing a button, a movement-related long-latency negativity (N1200) was recorded in frontal leads that was absent in a counting task. The LEP of targets, frequent non-targets and during distraction was dominated by a single large positivity. The amplitude of this positivity was task-dependent and increased the more attention the subject payed to the laser stimuli (distraction < neutral < non-target < target). The laser-evoked positivity during distraction had a peak latency of about 400 msec (P400) and a maximum amplitude at the vertex, which was independent of inter-stimulus interval. The P3 following laser stimulation had a significantly later peak at about 570 msec (P570) and a different scalp topography with a parietal maximum. Its amplitude decreased when the interstimulus interval was reduced from 10 to 6 sec. Under neutral instructions, the LEP positivity consisted of a superposition of both the exogenous P400 and the endogenous P570.