Molecular characterization of cuticle and interstitial collagens from worms collected at deep sea hydrothermal vents |
| |
Authors: | F Gaill H Wiedemann K Mann K Kühn R Timpl J Engel |
| |
Affiliation: | Centre de Biologie Cellulaire, CNRS, Ivry-sur-Seine, France. |
| |
Abstract: | Two different collagens were isolated and characterized from the body walls of the vestimentiferan tube worm Riftia pachyptila and the annelid Alvinella pompejana, both living around hydrothermal vents at a depth of 2600 m. The acid-soluble cuticle collagens consisted of a long triple helix (2.4 microns for Alvinella, 1.5 microns for Riftia) terminating into a globular domain. Molecular masses of 2600 and 1700 kDa, respectively, were estimated from their dimensions. The two cuticle collagens were also quite different in amino acid composition, in agreement with their different supramolecular organizations within tissues. Interstitial collagens corresponding to cross-striated fibrils underneath the epidermal cells could be solubilized by digestion with pepsin and consisted of a single alpha-chain. They were similar in molecular mass (340 kDa) and length (280 nm) but differed in composition and banding patterns of segment-long-spacing fibrils. This implicates significant sequence differences also in comparison to fibril-forming vertebrate collagens, although all form typical quarter-staggered fibrils. The thermal stability of the worm collagens was, with one exception (interstitial collagen of Riftia), in the range of mammalian and bird collagens (37 to 46 degrees C), and thus distinctly above that of shallow sea water annelids. Yet, their 4-hydroxyproline contents were not directly correlated to this stability. About 20% of Riftia collagen alpha-chain sequence was elucidated by Edman degradation and showed typical Gly-X-Y repeats but only a limited homology (45 to 58% identity) to fibril-forming vertebrate collagens. A single triplet imperfection and the variable hydroxylation of proline in the X position were additional unique features. It suggests that this collagen represents an ancestral form of fibril-forming collagens not directly corresponding to an individual fibril-forming collagen type of vertebrates. |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|