Effector phenotypes and mechanisms of antitumor immune reactivity of tumor-immunized and tumor-bearing mice in two syngeneic tumors.

By using two different syngeneic tumors, Meth A sarcoma and RL male 1 lymphoma of BALB/c origin, the present study was designed to investigate the subset(s) of T cells mediating in vivo antitumor immune responses and some of the effector mechanisms of in vivo protective immunity in BALB/c mice immunized against tumor or bearing tumor. Spleen cells from the mice immunized against Meth A tumor or bearing Meth A tumor inhibited the growth of Meth A tumor in the Winn assay. In the Meth A-immunized mice, L3T4+ (CD4+) cells played a major role in mediating the inhibitory activity against Meth A tumor growth, whereas in the Meth A-bearing mice, the antitumor protective immunity was mediated by both L3T4+ and Lyt-2+ (CD8+) cells. Spleen cells from the Meth A-immunized or Meth A-bearing mice were not able to generate cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) directed against Meth A tumor after the in vitro restimulation of spleen cells with mitomycin C (MMC)-treated Meth A cells, while fresh spleen cells from the Meth A-immunized or Meth A-bearing mice were able to induce the strong delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) responses to Meth A tumor. The DTH response to Meth A tumor was mediated by L3T4+ cells in the Meth A-immunized mice and by both L3T4+ and Lyt-2+ cells in the Meth A-bearing mice. In the similar experiments performed in the RL male 1 lymphoma, the antitumor activity in spleen cells from the RL male 1-immunized or RL male 1-bearing mice depended on Lyt-2+ but not L3T4+ cells in the Winn assay. When spleen cells from the RL male 1-immunized or RL male 1-bearing mice were cultured with MMC-treated RL male 1 cells for 5 days, an appreciable CTL response to RL male 1 tumor was induced. These results suggest that the nature of tumor and/or tumor antigens determines which T cell subset is required to exhibit the protective immunity against tumor and thus the different effector mechanisms could be induced in the different tumor models. Furthermore, these data support the conclusion that antitumor T cell responses are affected by the immune state of host to tumor.