首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

DSA引导下选择性脊神经根阻滞对腰椎间盘突出症临床疗效分析
引用本文:林尊强,曾义,夏智谦,刘婷婷,蔡统强,杨邦祥. DSA引导下选择性脊神经根阻滞对腰椎间盘突出症临床疗效分析[J]. 生物磁学, 2013, 0(34): 6692-6695,6767
作者姓名:林尊强  曾义  夏智谦  刘婷婷  蔡统强  杨邦祥
作者单位:[1]都江堰市人民医院疼痛科,四川都江堰611830 [2]四川大学华西医院麻醉科,四川成都610041
摘    要:目的:分析DSA引导下选择性脊神经根阻滞对腰椎间盘突出症,临床疗效。方法:将86例腰椎间盘突出症患者随机均分为SNRB组及PVB组。SNRB组患者采用DSA引导下选择性脊神经根阻滞。PVB组采用腰椎旁神经阻滞。对比两组患者用药、治疗前及治疗7d、14d时VAS评分、治疗7d及治疗14d时疗效及不良反应。结果:SNRB组患者在局麻药及得宝松用量上均明显低于PVB组(P〈0.01)。SNRB需加用口服镇痛药比例(6.98%)明显低于PVB(32.56%)(P〈0.01)。治疗7d及14d时,SNRB组VAS分值均明显低于PVB组(P〈0.01)。治疗7d后,SNRB组治疗总有效率达79.07%,明显高于PVB组总有效率(55.81%)(P〈0.05);治疗14d后,SNRB组总有效率达95_35%,明显高于PVB组(74.42%)(P〈0.01)。SNRB组不良反应发生率为4.65%。PVB组不良反应发生率为18.60%。PVB组不良反应发生率高于SNRB组(P〈0.05)。结论:DSA引导下选择性脊神经根阻滞具有阻滞用药少,阻滞效果更好,作用准确及安全的优点。

关 键 词:腰椎间盘突出症  脊神经根阻滞  椎旁神经阻滞

Clinical Effect Analyse of the Selective Spinal Nerve Root Block under DSA Guidance for the Lumbar Disc Herniation
LIN Zun-qian,ZENG Yi,XIA Zhi-qian,LIU Ting-ting,CAI Tong-qiang,YANG Bang-xiang. Clinical Effect Analyse of the Selective Spinal Nerve Root Block under DSA Guidance for the Lumbar Disc Herniation[J]. Biomagnetism, 2013, 0(34): 6692-6695,6767
Authors:LIN Zun-qian  ZENG Yi  XIA Zhi-qian  LIU Ting-ting  CAI Tong-qiang  YANG Bang-xiang
Affiliation:1 Pain Management, People's Hospital of Dujiangyan City, Dujiangyan, Sichuan, 611830, China; 2 Department of Anesthesiology, Huaxi Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Siahuan, 610041, China)
Abstract:Objective: To analyze the clinical effect of the selective spinal nerve root block trader DSA guidance for the lumbar disc herniation. Methods: 86 cases with lumbar disc herniation(LDH) were divided randomly into the SNRB and PVB averagely. The pa- tients in SNRB were taken selective spinal nerve root block under DSA guidance when the patients in PVB were taken para vertebral nerve block. The drng-use, VAS scores before 7 d and 14 d after the treatment, clinical effect after 7 d and 14 d treatment and the adverse reaction between the two group were compared. Results: The dose of local anesthetics and diprospan in the SNRB were obviously less than those in the PVB (P〈0.01). The rate of the patients who needed adding oral analgesics in the SNRB (6.98%) was lower than that in the PVB (32.56%)(P〈0.01). The VAS scores after 7 d and 14 d treatment in the SNRB were both lower than those scores in the PVB (P〈0.01). After 7 d treatment, the total effective rate in the SNRB was 79.07%, which was obviously higher than 55.81% in the PVB(P〈0. 01). After 14 d treatment, the total effective rate in the SNRB (95.35%) was higher than that in the PVB (74.42%)(P〈0.01). The adverse reaction rate in the SNRB was 4.65% when that n the PVB was18.60%, and the rate in the PVB was higher than that in SNRB(P〈0.01). Conclusion: Selected spinal nerve root block under the DSA guidance showed the advantage of less dose of blocking drug, better block- ing effect, blocking in precision and safety.
Keywords:Lumbar disc herniation(LDH)  Spinal nerve root block(SNRB)  Para vertebral nerve block(PVB)
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号