首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Clinical Validation of Automatable Gaussian Normalized CBV in Brain Tumor Analysis: Superior Reproducibility and Slightly Better Association with Survival than Current Standard Manual Normal Appearing White Matter Normalization
Authors:Lei Qin  Xiang Li  Angie Li  Suchun Cheng  Jinrong Qu  Katherine Reinshagen  Jiani Hu  Nathan Himes  Gao Lu  Xiaoyin Xu  Geoffrey S Young
Institution:2. Harvard Medical School, Department of Radiology, Boston, MA, USA;3. Brigham and Women''s Hospital, Department of Radiology, Boston, MA, USA;4. Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Department of Radiology, Zhengzhou, Henan, China;5. The Robert Larner, M.D. College of Medicine at the University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA;11. Medical Imaging of Lehigh Valley, Lehigh Valley Hospital, Allentown, PA, USA;12. Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing, China
Abstract:PURPOSE: To validate Gaussian normalized cerebral blood volume (GN-nCBV) by association with overall survival (OS) in newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients and compare this association with current standard white matter normalized cerebral blood volume (WN-nCBV). METHODS: We retrieved spin-echo echo-planar dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI acquired after maximal resection and prior to radiation therapy between 2006 and 2011 in 51 adult patients (28 male, 23 female; age 23-87 years) with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Software code was developed in house to perform Gaussian normalization of CBV to the standard deviation of the whole brain CBV. Three expert readers manually selected regions of interest in tumor and normal-appearing white matter on CBV maps. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves associating nCBV with 15-month OS were calculated for both GN-nCBV and WN-nCBV. Reproducibility and interoperator variability were compared using within-subject coefficient of variation (wCV) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). RESULTS: GN-nCBV ICC (≥0.82) and wCV (≤21%) were superior to WN-nCBV ICC (0.54-0.55) and wCV (≥46%). The area under the ROC curve analysis demonstrated both GN-nCBV and WN-nCBV to be good predictors of OS, but GN-nCBV was consistently superior, although the difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: GN-nCBV has a slightly better association with clinical gold standard OS than conventional WM-nCBV in our glioblastoma patient cohort. This equivalent or superior validity, combined with the advantages of higher reproducibility, lower interoperator variability, and easier automation, makes GN-nCBV superior to WM-nCBV for clinical and research use in glioma patients. We recommend widespread adoption and incorporation of GN-nCBV into commercial dynamic susceptibility contrast processing software.
Keywords:Address all correspondence to: Geoffrey S  Young  MD  Brigham and Women's Hospital  Department of Radiology  75 Francis Street  Boston  MA  USA 02115  
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号