首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Measuring size and composition of species pools: a comparison of dark diversity estimates
Authors:Francesco de Bello  Pavel Fibich  David Zelený  Martin Kopecký  Ond?ej Mudrák  Milan Chytrý  Petr Py?ek  Jan Wild  Dana Michalcová  Ji?í Sádlo  Petr ?milauer  Jan Lep?  Meelis Pärtel
Institution:1. Institute of Botany, The Czech Academy of Sciences, T?eboň, Czech Republic;2. Department of Botany, University of South Bohemia, ?eské Budějovice, Czech Republic;3. Department of Botany and Zoology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic;4. Institute of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan;5. Institute of Botany, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic;6. Department of Forest Ecology, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague 6 – Suchdol, Czech Republic;7. Institute of Botany, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Pr?honice, Czech Republic;8. Department of Ecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic;9. Department of Botany and Zoology, Centre for Invasion Biology, Stellenbosch University, Matieland, South Africa;10. Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague 6 – Suchdol, Czech Republic;11. Department of Ecosystem Biology, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, ?eské Budějovice, Czech Republic;12. Biology Centre, The Czech Academy of Sciences, ?eské Budějovice, Czech Republic;13. Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
Abstract:Ecological theory and biodiversity conservation have traditionally relied on the number of species recorded at a site, but it is agreed that site richness represents only a portion of the species that can inhabit particular ecological conditions, that is, the habitat‐specific species pool. Knowledge of the species pool at different sites enables meaningful comparisons of biodiversity and provides insights into processes of biodiversity formation. Empirical studies, however, are limited due to conceptual and methodological difficulties in determining both the size and composition of the absent part of species pools, the so‐called dark diversity. We used >50,000 vegetation plots from 18 types of habitats throughout the Czech Republic, most of which served as a training dataset and 1083 as a subset of test sites. These data were used to compare predicted results from three quantitative methods with those of previously published expert estimates based on species habitat preferences: (1) species co‐occurrence based on Beals' smoothing approach; (2) species ecological requirements, with envelopes around community mean Ellenberg values; and (3) species distribution models, using species environmental niches modeled by Biomod software. Dark diversity estimates were compared at both plot and habitat levels, and each method was applied in different configurations. While there were some differences in the results obtained by different methods, particularly at the plot level, there was a clear convergence, especially at the habitat level. The better convergence at the habitat level reflects less variation in local environmental conditions, whereas variation at the plot level is an effect of each particular method. The co‐occurrence agreed closest the expert estimate, followed by the method based on species ecological requirements. We conclude that several analytical methods can estimate species pools of given habitats. However, the strengths and weaknesses of different methods need attention, especially when dark diversity is estimated at the plot level.
Keywords:Beals smoothing  biodiversity monitoring  Biomod  dark diversity  Ellenberg indicator values  method comparison  species distribution modeling
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号