The eccentric,concentric strength relationship of the hamstring muscles in chronic low back pain |
| |
| Authors: | Paul WM Marshall Jamie Mannion Bernadette A Murphy |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Department of Health, Exercise Science, and Recreation Management, Kevser Ermin Applied Physiology Laboratory, The University of Mississippi, University, MS, United States;2. Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, United States;1. Department of Physical Therapy, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Tehran, Iran;2. School of Medicine, AJA University of Medical Science, Tehran, Tehran, Iran;3. Department of Physical Therapy, University of North Georgia, Dahlonega, Georgia;1. School of Sport, Health, and Social Sciences, Southampton Solent University, Southampton, UK;2. AECC Clinic, Anglo European College of Chiropractic, Bournemouth, UK |
| |
| Abstract: | ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to measure hamstring muscle eccentric and concentric strength in individuals with and without low back pain (LBP). Two composite scores for the relative balance of eccentric to concentric strength at the different movement velocities were calculated (the DEC and SEC), to determine whether or not self perceived pain, disability, or fear avoidance measures were associated with hamstring strength characteristics.DesignCross-sectional repeated measures design.SettingUniversity laboratory.ParticipantsFifteen individuals with chronic LBP and 15 matched controls.Main outcome measuresIsokinetic eccentric and concentric strength at 30° s?1 and 120° s?1. Composite scores (DEC and SEC) based on peak torque were calculated to evaluate the relationship between the different muscle actions across the test velocities. Self report measures included the Oswestry disability index, general health and well being, fear avoidance, and pain.ResultsEccentric/concentric strength ratio at 30° s?1 was higher for the LBP group (F(1,58) = 4.81, p = 0.032). The SEC was also higher for the LBP (F(1,58) = 5.97, p = 0.018). Fear avoidance beliefs and mental well-being were significantly associated with the SEC only in the LBP group (adjusted r2 = 0.26, (F(2,27) = 5.8, p = .008). For the control group both the DEC and SEC were associated with self report measures. Matched differences between groups’ for the SEC were best explained by fear avoidance beliefs about work (adjusted r2 = 0.12, F(1,28) = 5.1, p = 0.03).ConclusionReduced concentric relative to eccentric strength is best identified by the SEC. The SEC was significantly associated with impaired self report measures of fear avoidance and mental well being in individuals with LBP. Differences between groups for the SEC were best explained by fear avoidance beliefs about work. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
