Dangerous life at the edge: Implications of seed predation for roadside revegetation |
| |
| Authors: | Alberto Suárez‐Esteban Miguel Delibes José M Fedriani |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Department of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada;2. Yukon Research Centre, Yukon College, Whitehorse, YT, Canada;3. Departamento de Biología de la Conservación, Estación Biológica de Do?ana (CSIC), Sevilla, Spain;4. Centre for Applied Ecology “Prof. Baeta Neves”/INBIO, Institute of Agronomy, University of Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal |
| |
| Abstract: | Question Anthropogenic edges caused by transport infrastructure such as dirt roads and trails (also known as Soft Linear Developments; SLD) are pervasive in almost every terrestrial ecosystem. Revegetating these edges may reduce some of their negative effects, such as their permeability to biological invasions and detrimental effects on wildlife, potentially becoming suitable habitat for a broad range of species. Selecting species with low post‐dispersal seed predation rates may improve the effectiveness of revegetation programmes. Location Mediterranean scrublands in SW Spain. Methods We made offerings of a total of 16,000 seeds of eight species of fleshy‐fruit shrubs both along SLD edges and scrubland interiors in two independent blocks in each of three distant locations. Using four types of selective enclosure, we assessed the relative contribution of three seed predator guilds (ants, rodents and birds) to seed predation rates both along SLD edges and scrubland interiors. Results The effects of anthropogenic edges on seed predation rates were species‐specific. The large and hard‐seeded species Chamaerops humilis was not predated at all. Juniperus phoenicea and Corema album seeds had higher predation rates in scrubland interiors than in edges. The small‐seeded Rubus ulmifolius experienced relatively low seed predation rates compared to the other species. Predation rates for this species were higher along SLD edges than in scrubland interiors. Ants were the main seed predators in the area, and showed marked preferences for J. macrocarpa and C. album seeds at both SLD edges and scrubland interiors. Conclusions Our results show the strong context‐dependency of seed predation rates in both SLD edges and scrubland interiors, and thus the importance of well spatially and temporally replicated studies. Species with large and hard seeds may be good candidates for roadside revegetation programmes. However, the relative suitability of plant species would depend on the seed predator community. Our findings confirm that studies on seed predation may help planning cost‐effective species selection for edge revegetation efforts worldwide. |
| |
| Keywords: | fragmentation hedgerow invasion control linear disturbances Mediterranean shrubland mitigation restoration road trail |
|
|
