首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Restoring volume,diversity and continuity of deadwood in boreal forests
Authors:Anne-Maarit Hekkala  Anssi Ahtikoski  Marja-Leena Päätalo  Oili Tarvainen  Jouni Siipilehto  Anne Tolvanen
Affiliation:1.Thule Institute,University of Oulu,Oulu,Finland;2.Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke),Oulu,Finland;3.Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke),Vantaa,Finland;4.Department of Ecology,University of Oulu,Oulu,Finland;5.Department of Wildlife, Fish and Environmental Studies,Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences,Ume?,Sweden
Abstract:Restoration of boreal forests by emulating natural disturbances is used to bring back typical components of natural forests that are reduced by silvicultural management. The volume, diversity and continuity of deadwood are the most important factors determining the diversity of deadwood-dependent species. In a large-scale experiment consisting of 43 experimental stands and 15 controls we assessed how alternative restoration methods enhancing deadwood availability (felling and felling + burning with two levels of felling: 20 and 40 % of initial volume of living trees, and a storm treatment) would affect short- and long-term deadwood volume and diversity using 7-year deadwood measurements and simulation modelling. In short-term, restoration by felling + burning increased both the volume and diversity of deadwood, whereas felling only increased merely the volume of deadwood. The simulations of tree growth, mortality and wood decomposition indicated that in comparison to controls, felled and storm-treated stands have greater deadwood volumes up to 40 years and felled + burned stands more than 60 years after restoration. Our results suggest that felling with 20 % of initial tree volume does not harm the future deadwood continuity, whereas intensive burning may imperil the deadwood continuity in a stand level. In conclusion, restoration clearly speeds up the development of the deadwood volumes needed to host large portions of biodiversity, and burning is the most effective restoration method in short- and long term. In practice, several restoration methods could be used concurrently in the landscape to obtain the best results.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号