Climatic classification and ordination of the Spanish Sistema Central: relationships with potential vegetation

Comparisons among European, Japanese and North-American temperate deciduous woody floras revealed that there is no difference in shade-tolerance or in successional position between the compound- and simple-leaved species. Given that the compound-leaved species usually have greater biomass investments in non-productive throwaway supporting structures, it remained unclear how they could be as shade-tolerant as the simple-leaved analogues. To find out the role of the variability in leaf structure and composition in shade-tolerance of these species, foliar morphology and chemistry were analysed in 15 Estonian temperate compound-leaved deciduous woody taxa.Both foliar morphological and chemical parameters influenced the fractional investment of foliar biomass in petioles. The proportion of leaf biomass in petioles was independent of leaf size, but it increased with increasing leaflet number per leaf, suggesting that spacing rather than support requirements determined the biomass investment in petioles. The leaves with greater nitrogen concentrations also had larger foliar biomass investments in petioles. The latter effect possibly resulted from a greater water demand of functionally more active protein-rich leaves. Though the proportion of leaf biomass invested in petioles was high (for the whole material on average 15.9±0.4%), petioles were considerably cheaper to construct in terms of mineral nutrients than leaflets. e.g., petioles contained on average only 5.55±0.14% of total leaf nitrogen. Since in many cases the availability of mineral nutrients such as nitrogen rather than organic carbon sets limits to total leaf biomass on the plant, I suggested, contrary to previous claims, that the costs for foliage formation should not necessarily be different between compound- and simple-leaved species. Compound-leaved species also fit the basic relationships previously observed in simple-leaved analogues. Leaf size increased and leaf dry mass per area (LMA) decreased with increasing shade-tolerance. Thus, more shade-tolerant species construct a more effective foliar display for light interception at low irradiance with similar biomass investment in leaves. Species shade-tolerance was independent of biomass investment in petioles. However, due to the genotypic plasticity in LMA, more shade-tolerant species supported more foliar area at a constant leaf biomass investment in petioles.