| Abstract: | This paper presents results of field studies on the estuarine dinoflagellate Prorocentrum mariae-lebouriae (Parke & Ballantine) Faust in Chesapeake Bay. We tested the hypothesis that the photosynthetic physiology of Prorocentrum shows adaptive responses to low-light during a lengthy subpycnocline transport in estuarine circulation. Prorocentrum underwent a seasonal, northward trnasport between February and June, 1984 and 1985. Low cell densities occurred in the seaward part of the estuary during winter and early-spring, subpycnocline populations progressed up-estuary in the ensuring 2–3 months, and dense surface populations developed in the mesohaline portion of the estuary thereafter. We sampled Prorocentrum from surface and subpycnocline waters and measured photosynthesis-light (P-I) relations with in situ incubations. The photophysiology of Prorocentrum collected below the pycnoline differed from that of cells in the surface mixed layer in that photosynthetic efficiency, α-cell?1, was higher, photosynthetic capacity, Pmax-cell?1 was ·4 times greater for subpycnocline (≦ 10m) samples than for those from the surface mixed layer (≧ 6m). Comparison of in situ photosynthetic properties to those generated in laboratory studies showed that values of α·cell?1 for both surface and subpycnocline samples were in the range found for cultures in low-light. Concentrations of Chls a, c and peridinin·cell?1 and molar pigment ratios peridinin: Chl a and Chl a: Chl c were not significantly different for the surface and subpycnocline samples, nor were C · cell?1 or C : Chl a. Chloroplast and starch volume fractions and the number of thylakoids were the same for samples collected at different depths, and there was no evidence of cytoplasmic vacuolization in any field samples. These morphometric data for cells from natural populations of Prorocentrum most closely resembled data for laboratory cultures grown at or near 2.6E·m-?2·4d?1. A lower growth irradiance of 0.3E·m?2·d?1 produced indications of stress in cultures, including starch depletion and vacuolization, that were never observed in natural populations. Based on the combination of these findings, we conclude that Prorocentrum is adapted to low-light both in the surface mixed layer and beneath the pycnocline, although certain photophysiological characteristics distinguish these two groups of samples. |
