Comparison of three granular support materials for anaerobic fluidized bed systems

Summary Three different materials, kaolin, pozzolana and biolite (a material used in a commercial anaerobic fluidized bed treatment process) when tested as supports for an anaerobic fluidized bed system had similar physical and fluidization properties but behaved differently towards the biomass hold-up. However, all three systems attained similar removal efficiency rates.Nomenclature U Fluidization velocity (m/s) - U₁ Terminal fluidization velocity (m/s) - g Local acceleration due to gravity (m/s²) - _s Solid density (kg/m³) - _f Fluid density (kg/m³) - P Pressure drop (Pa) - HRT Hydraulic retention time (days) - H_mf Height of bed at minimum fluidization (m) - H Height of bed (m) - C_d Drag coefficient (dimensionless) - W Mass of solids in bed (kg) - dp Particle diameter (m) - A Cross-sectional area of column (m²) - h column height (m) - Rc_t Terminal Reynolds no. - Voidagc (fractional free volume, dimensionless) - _mf Voidage (fractional free volume) at minimum of fluidization (dimensionless)