| Abstract: | Subjects were trained to identify by assigned number commonsubstances presented as vapor phase stimuli via an orthonasalor a retronasal route. Following training, odorant identificationlearning was evaluated by measuring ability to correctly identifyto a criterion. Those who met the criterion were then testedfirst with the stimuli presented to the nares that differedin location from the nares used in training, and second to thenares that corresponded in location to the nares used in training.It was found that, under conditions of natural retronasal breathing,orthonasally trained subjects made correct identifications on{small tilde}80% of the trials upon retronasal testing, butfor the following orthonasal testing identifications were significantlymore frequent, approaching 100% correct. After subsequent retronasaltraining, the same subjects' orthonasal identifications remainedsignificantly higher, although identifications improved to {smalltilde}92% correct on retronasal trials. Other subjects wereinstructed in a breathing technique designed to enhance retronasalstimulation. After orthonasal training, retronasal testing ofthese subjects still gave significantly fewer correct identificationsthan orthonasal testing, notwithstanding the modified retronasalbreathing, but after subsequent retronasal training correctidentifications by these subjects no longer differed significantlybetween orthonasal and retronasal testing. Efficacy of modifiedretronasal breathing was confirmed in two subsequent experiments.The observed substantial positive transfers between retronasaland orthonasal odorant identification training and testing locidemonstrate that these odorant pathways do not subserve completelyindependent olfactory systems, while the less accurate identificationsvia the retronasal route, unless instruction in retronasal breathingwas given, suggest a difference in the efficiency with whichodorants are normally delivered to the olfactory mucosa. Chem.Senses 21: 529–543, 1996. |
