The relationship between preferred and optimal positioning during submaximal cycle ergometry

This study was designed to determine how changes in oxygen uptake (O₂) and heart rate (HR) during submaximal cycle ergometry were determined by changes in cycle geometry and/or lower-limb kinematics. Fourteen trained cyclists Mean (SD): age, 25.5 (6.4) years; body mass 74.4 (8.8) kg; peak O₂, 4.76 (0.79) l. min⁻¹ peak] were tested at three seat-tube angles (70°, 80°, 90°) at each of three trunk angles (10°, 20°, 30°) using a modified Monark cycle ergometer. All conditions were tested at a power output corresponding to 95% of the O₂ at each subject's ventilatory threshold while pedalling at 90 rpm and using aerodynamic handlebars. Sagittal-view kinematics for the hip, knee, and ankle joints were also recorded for all conditions and for the subjects' preferred positioning on their own bicycles. No combination of seat-tube and trunk angle could be considered optimal since many of the nine conditions elicited statistically similar mean O₂ and HR values. Mean hip angle (HA) was the only kinematic variable that changed consistently across conditions. A regression relationship was not observed between mean O₂ or HR and mean hip angle values (P > 0.45). Significant curvilinear relationships were observed, however, between ΔO₂ (O₂ − minimum O₂) and ΔHA (mean HA − preferred HA) using the data from all subjects (R = 0.45, SEE = 0.13 l . min⁻¹) and using group mean values (R = 0.93, SEE = 0.03 l . min⁻¹). In both cases ΔO₂ minimized at ΔHA = 0, which corresponded to the subjects' preferred HA from their own bicycles. Thus, subjects optimized their O₂ cost at cycle geometries that elicited similar lower-limb kinematics as the preferred geometries from their own bicycles. Accepted: 3 July 1996