Comparison of intestinal folate carrier clone expressed in IEC-6 cells and in Xenopus oocytes

We recently identified a cDNA clone frommouse small intestine, which appears to be involved in folate transportwhen expressed in Xenopus oocytes. Theopen reading frame of this clone is identical to that of the reducedfolate carrier (RFC) (K. H. Dixon, B. C. Lanpher, J. Chiu, K. Kelley,and K. H. Cowan. J. Biol. Chem. 269: 17-20,1994). The characteristics of this cDNA clone previously referred toas intestinal folate carrier 1 (IFC-1)] expressed inXenopus oocytes, however, were foundto be different from the characteristics of folate transport in nativesmall intestinal epithelial cells. To further study these differences,we determined the characteristics of RFC when expressed in anintestinal epithelial cell line, IEC-6, and compared the findings toits characteristics when expressed inXenopus oocytes. RFC was stablytransfected into IEC-6 cells by electroporation; its cRNA wasmicroinjected into Xenopus oocytes.Northern blot analysis of poly(A)⁺RNA from IEC-6 cells stably transfected with RFC cDNA (IEC-6/RFC) showed a twofold increase in RFC mRNA levels over controls. Similarly, uptake of folic acid and 5-methyltetrahydrofolate (5-MTHF) by IEC-6/RFCwas found to be fourfold higher than uptake in control sublines. Thisincrease in folic acid and 5-MTHF uptake was inhibited by treatingIEC-6/RFC cells with cholesterol-modified antisense DNAoligonucleotides. The increase in uptake was found to be mainly mediated through an increase in the maximal velocity(V_max) of theuptake process the apparent Michaelis-Menten constant(K_m) alsochanged (range was 0.31 to 1.56 µM), but no specific trend wasseen]. In both IEC-6/RFC and control sublines, the uptake of bothfolic acid and 5-MTHF displayed 1)pH dependency, with a higher uptake at acidic pH 5.5 compared with pH7.5, and 2) inhibition to the sameextent by both reduced and oxidized folate derivatives. Thesecharacteristics are very similar to those seen in native intestinalepithelial cells. In contrast, RFC expressed inXenopus oocytes showed1) higher uptake at neutral andalkaline pH 7.5 compared with acidic pH 5.5 and2) higher sensitivity to reducedcompared with oxidized folate derivatives. Results of these studiesdemonstrate that the characteristics of RFC vary depending on the cellsystem in which it is expressed. Furthermore, the results may suggestthe involvement of cell- or tissue-specific posttranslationalmodification(s) and/or the existence of an auxiliary proteinthat may account for the differences in the characteristics of theintestinal RFC when expressed inXenopus oocytes compared with whenexpressed in intestinal epithelial cells.