The effect of topsoil removal in restored heathland on soil fauna, topsoil microstructure, and cellulose decomposition: implications for ecosystem restoration |
| |
Authors: | Jan Frouz Rudy Van Diggelen Vaclav Pi?l Josef Starý Ladislav Háněl Karel Tajovský Ji?í Kal?ík |
| |
Institution: | 1. Institute of Soil Biology, Biological Centre Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Na Sádkách 7, 37005, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic 4. Institute for Environmental Studies, Charles University, Benátská 2, 120000, Prague, Czech Republic 2. Community and Conservation Ecology Group, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 14, 9750 AA, Haren, The Netherlands 3. Ecosystem Management Research Group, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Wilrijk, Belgium
|
| |
Abstract: | Communities of soil macrofauna, oribatid mites, and nematodes as well as vegetation and soil chemistry were studied on twelve
plots representing three replicates of the following treatments: agricultural meadow, heathland, and heathland restored either
by partial or complete topsoil removal 15 years earlier. We also studied the effect of soil macrofauna on decomposition and
the microstructure of the soil surface layer with litterbags in combination with the analysis of thin soil sections. The communities
of soil macrofauna and oribatid mites significantly differed between agricultural meadows and heathlands. The partial and
complete topsoil removal plots were more similar to heathlands with respect to macrofauna and to agricultural meadows with
respect to oribatid mites. The density and diversity of soil macrofauna was higher in agricultural meadows than in heathlands;
in particular, earthworms, litter transformers, root feeders, and microsaprophags were more abundant on meadows. Heathlands,
in contrast, contained a much higher diversity of oribatid mites. The community structure of nematodes did not significantly
differ among the treatments. Analysis of thin soil sections revealed a thick organic fermentation layer in heathlands, which
was absent in agricultural meadows and only weakly developed in the topsoil removal plots. In agricultural meadows, litterbags
and thin soil sections indicated that abundant macrofauna, including endogeic earthworms, were very effective in removing
the litter from the soil surface and mixing it into the mineral soil. Possible effects of this soil mixing on restoration
success are discussed. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|