首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Postural differences in shoulder dynamics during pushing and pulling
Institution:1. School of Kinesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA;2. Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA;1. Human Motor Systems Laboratory, School of Physical Education and Sport, University of São Paulo Av. Prof. Mello Moraes, 65, Cidade Universitária, São Paulo, SP, 05508-030, Brazil;2. Institute of Radiology, LIM44, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo Av. Dr. Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, s/n°, Rua 1 , Cerqueira César, São Paulo, SP, 5,403–900, Brazil;3. Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo Rua Doutor Ovídio Pires de Campos,785 , Cerqueira César, São Paulo, SP, 5403,010, Brazil;1. Department of Training and Movement Sciences, Humboldt-University Berlin, Philippstr. 13, 10115 Berlin, Germany;2. Department of Neurology, St. Joseph Hospital, Ruhr-University, Gudrunstr. 56, 44791 Bochum, Germany;1. Medical School, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland;2. Department of Hand and Microsurgery, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland;3. Department of Mechanical Engineering and Industrial Systems, Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, Finland;4. Department of Surgery, Central Hospital of Central Finland, Jyväskylä, Finland
Abstract:Assessments of shoulder dynamics (e.g. the inertial, viscous, and stiffness properties of the joint) can provide important insights into the stability of the joint at rest and during volitional contraction. The purpose of this study was to investigate how arm posture influences shoulder dynamics while generating pushing or pulling torques in the horizontal plane. Sixteen healthy participants were examined in seven postures encompassing a large workspace of the shoulder. At each posture, the participant’s shoulder was rapidly perturbed while measuring the resultant change in shoulder torque about the glenohumeral axis. Participants were examined both at rest and while producing horizontal flexion and extension torques scaled to 15% of a maximum voluntary contraction. Shoulder stiffness, viscosity, and damping ratio were estimated using impedance-based matching, and changes in these outcome measures with torque level, elevation angle, and plane of elevation angle were explored with a linear mixed effects model. Shoulder stiffness was found to decrease with increasing elevation angles (p < 0.001) without subsequent changes in viscosity, leading to a greater damping ratios at higher elevation angles (p < 0.001). Shoulder stiffness, viscosity, and damping ratio (all p < 0.05) were all found to significantly increase as the plane of elevation of the arm was increased. The relationship between the viscosity, stiffness and the damping ratio of the shoulder is one that the central nervous system must regulate in order to maintain stability, protect against injury, and control the shoulder joint as the inertial and muscle contributions change across different arm postures.
Keywords:Shoulder stiffness  Joint impedance  Joint mechanics  Viscosity  System identification
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号