首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Workshop report: Cryopreservation of aquatic biomedical models
Affiliation:1. Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute (SCBI) and Hawaii Institute of Marine Biology (HIMB), Kaneohe, HI, USA;2. Zebrafish International Research Center, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA;4. Aquatic Germplasm and Genetic Resources Center, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center (LSUAC), Baton Rouge, LA, USA;1. School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan 611731, PR China;2. Wellman Center for Photomedicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Division of Endocrinology, Massachusetts General Hospital, VA Boston Healthcare System, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA;3. Institute of Blood Transfusion, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Chengdu, Sichuan 610052, China;4. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA;1. Fundamental and Applied Cryobiology Group, Biochemistry Cellular and Molecular Biology, University of Tennessee, 37912, Knoxville, TN, United States;2. Marine Biological Resources Functional Preservation Service, Estación de Ciencias Mariñas de Toralla, Universidade de Vigo, Illa de Toralla, 36331, Coruxo, Vigo, Spain;1. Reef Biology Research Group, Department of Marine Science, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand;2. Department of Biotechnology, Mingdao University, Peetow, Chang Hua, Taiwan;3. Department of Post Modern Agriculture, Mingdao University, Peetow, Chang Hua, Taiwan;4. National Museum of Marine Biology & Aquarium, Checheng, Pingtung, Taiwan;5. Institute of Marine Biology, National Dong Hwa University, Checheng, Pingtung, Taiwan
Abstract:The genetic resources of aquatic biomedical model organisms are the products of millions of years of evolution, decades of scientific development, and hundreds of millions of dollars of research funding investment. Genetic resources (e.g., specific alleles, transgenes, or combinations) of each model organism can be considered a form of scientific wealth that can be accumulated and exchanged, typically in the form of live animals or germplasm. Large-scale maintenance of live aquatic organisms that carry these genetic resources is inefficient, costly, and risky. In situ maintenance may be substantially enhanced and backed up by combining cryopreserved germplasm repositories and genetic information systems with live animal culture. Unfortunately, cryopreservation has not advanced much beyond the status of an exploratory research for most aquatic species, lacks widespread application, and methods for successful cryopreservation remain poorly defined. For most aquatic species biological materials other than sperm or somatic cells are not comprehensively banked to represent and preserve a broad range of genetic diversity for each species. Therefore, new approaches and standardization are needed for repository-level application to ensure reproducible recovery of cryopreserved materials. Additionally, development of new technologies is needed to address preservation of novel biological materials, such as eggs and embryos of aquatic species. To address these goals, the Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (ORIP) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) hosted the Cryopreservation of Aquatic Biomedical Models Workshop on January 7 to 8, 2017, in conjunction with the 8th Aquatic Animal Models of Human Disease Conference in Birmingham, Alabama. The goals of the workshop were to assess the status of germplasm cryopreservation in various biomedical aquatic models and allow representatives of the scientific community to develop and prioritize a consensus of specific actionable recommendations that will move the field of cryopreservation of aquatic resources forward. This workshop included sessions devoted to new approaches for cryopreservation of aquatic species, discussion of current efforts and approaches in preservation of aquatic model germplasm, consideration of needs for standardization of methods to support reproducibility, and enhancement of repository development by establishment of scalable high-throughput technologies. The following three broad recommendations were forwarded from workshop attendees:1Establish a comprehensive, centralized unit (“hub”) to programmatically develop training for and documentation of cryopreservation methods for aquatic model systems. This would include development of species-specific protocols and approaches, outreach programs, community development and standardization, freezing services and training of the next generation of experts in aquatic cryopreservation.2Provide mechanisms to support innovative technical advancements that will increase the reliability, reproducibility, simplicity, throughput, and efficiency of the cryopreservation process, including vitrification and pipelines for sperm, oocytes, eggs, embryos, larvae, stem cells, and somatic cells of all aquatic species. This recommendation encompasses basic cryopreservation knowledge and engineering technology, such as microfluidics and automated processing technologies.3Implement mechanisms that allow the various aquatic model stock centers to increase their planning, personnel, ability to secure genetic resources and to promote interaction within an integrated, comprehensive repository network for aquatic model species repositories.
Keywords:Germplasm  Cryopreservation  Cryobiology  Microfluidics  Repositories  Stock centers
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号