Where the wild things are: environmental preservationand human nature |
| |
Authors: | Marc Ereshefsky |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Department of Philosophy, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 1N4, Canada |
| |
Abstract: | Environmental philosophers spend considerable time drawing the divide between humans and the rest of nature. Some argue that humans and our actions are unnatural. Others allow that humans are natural, but maintain that humans are nevertheless distinct. The motivation for distinguishing humans from the rest of nature is the desire to determine what aspects of the environment should be preserved. The standard view is that we should preserve those aspects of the environment outside of humans and our influence. This paper examines the standard view by asking two questions. First, are the suggested grounds for distinguishing humans from the rest of the environment viable? Second, is such a distinction even needed for determining what to preserve? The paper concludes that debates over whether humans are natural and whether humans are unique are unhelpful when deciding what to preserve. |
| |
Keywords: | Environmental preservation Human culture Human nature Human/nature dichotomy Natural Wilderness |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|