Carbon balance in tussock tundra under ambient and elevated atmospheric CO2

Summary Whole ecosystem CO₂ flux under ambient (340 l/l) and elevated (680 l/l) CO₂ was measured in situ in Eriophorum tussock tundra on the North Slope of Alaska. Elevated CO₂ resulted in greater carbon acquisition than control treatments and there was a net loss of CO₂ under ambient conditions at this upland tundra site. These measurements indicate a current loss of carbon from upland tundra, possibly the result of recent climatic changes. Elevated CO₂ for the duration of one growing season appeared to delay the onset of dormancy and resulted in approximately 10 additional days of positive ecosystem flux. Homeostatic adjustment of ecosystem CO₂ flux (sum of species' response) was apparent by the third week of exposure to elevated CO₂. Ecosystem dark respiration rates were not significantly higher at elevated CO₂ levels. Rapid homeostatic adjustment to elevated CO₂ may limit carbon uptake in upland tundra. Abiotic factors were evaluated as predictors of ecosystem CO₂ flux. For chambers exposed to ambient and elevated CO₂ levels for the duration of the growing season, seasonality (Julian day) was the best predictor of ecosystem CO₂ flux at both ambient and elevated CO₂ levels. Light (PAR), soil temperature, and air temperature were also predictive of seasonal ecosystem flux, but only at elevated CO₂ levels. At any combination of physical conditions, flux of the elevated CO₂ treatment was greater than that at ambient. In short-term manipulations of CO₂, tundra exposed to elevated CO₂ had threefold greater carbon gain, and had one half the ecosystem level, light compensation point when compared to ambient CO₂ treatments. Elevated CO₂-acclimated tundra had twofold greater carbon gain compared to ambient treatments, but there was no difference in ecosystem level, light compensation point between elevated and ambient CO₂ treatments. The predicted future increases in cloudiness could substantially decrease the effect of elevated atmospheric CO₂ on net ecosystem carbon budget. These analyses suggest little if any long-term stimulation of ecosystem carbon acquisition by increases in atmospheric CO₂.