Differences in changes of the alpha1-beta2 subunit contacts between ligand binding to the alpha and beta subunits of hemoglobin A: UV resonance raman analysis using Ni-Fe hybrid hemoglobin

The alpha1-beta2 subunit contacts in the half-ligated hemoglobin A (Hb A) have been explored with ultraviolet resonance Raman (UVRR) spectroscopy using the Ni-Fe hybrid Hb under various solution conditions. Our previous studies demonstrated that Trpbeta37, Tyralpha42, and Tyralpha140 are mainly responsible for UVRR spectral differences between the complete T (deoxyHb A) and R (COHb A) structures [Nagai, M., Wajcman, H., Lahary, A., Nakatsukasa, T., Nagatomo, S., and Kitagawa, T. (1999) Biochemistry, 38, 1243-1251]. On the basis of it, the UVRR spectra observed for the half-ligated alpha(Ni)beta(CO) and alpha(CO)beta(Ni) at pH 6.7 in the presence of IHP indicated the adoption of the complete T structure similar to alpha(Ni)beta(deoxy) and alpha(deoxy)beta(Ni). The extent of the quaternary structural changes upon ligand binding depends on pH and IHP, but their characters are qualitatively the same. For alpha(Ni)beta(Fe), it is not until pH 8.7 in the absence of IHP that the Tyr bands are changed by ligand binding. The change of Tyr residues is induced by binding of CO, but not of NO, to the alpha heme, while it was similarly induced by binding of CO and NO to the beta heme. The Trp bands are changed toward R-like similarly for alpha(Ni)beta(CO) and alpha(CO)beta(Ni), indicating that the structural changes of Trp residues are scarcely different between CO binding to either the alpha or beta heme. The ligand induced quaternary structural changes of Tyr and Trp residues did not take place in a concerted way and were different between alpha(Ni)beta(CO) and alpha(CO)beta(Ni). These observations directly indicate that the phenomenon occurring at the alpha1-beta2 interface is different between the ligand binding to the alpha and beta hemes and is greatly influenced by IHP. A plausible mechanism of the intersubunit communication upon binding of a ligand to the alpha or beta subunit to the other subunit and its difference between NO and CO as a ligand are discussed.