Vegetative Parthenocarpy in the Cactus Pear Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Mill.

The dependence of fruit development on fertilization was studiedin two clones of Opuntia ficus-indica, Ofer and BSI. Fruitsof the clone Ofer bear fully developed seeds, whereas fruitsof the clone BSI contain only degenerated seeds and it was suspectedthat BSI is parthenocarpic. The two clones differed in theirpattern of fruit development. The increase in fruit fresh weightin Ofer was a result of both peel and pulp growth, whereas inBSI fruit growth was mainly due to pulp growth and the peelhad reached its final weight almost at anthesis. Pulp growthin BSI commenced earlier and was faster than in Ofer, but thefinal pulp weight in BSI was only 64% of that in Ofer. Seedgrowth in BSI was limited to the development of semilignifiedand lignified seed coats, whereas in Ofer 43·5% of theseeds were completely developed, the remainder being similarto those found in BSI. Fruits bearing well-developed seeds werealso found in a 'mutant' of BSI that, like Ofer, contained smallerovules at anthesis than flower of the regular BSI genotype.Germination in vivo and in vitro were similar in BSI and Ofer,but pollen tubes failed to reach the ovules in the regular BSIgenotype, while penetrating the ovules in Ofer and the small-ovuledgenotype of BSI. Good-quality fruits similar to Ofer fruitsin weight but with a higher peel to pulp ratio developed inBSI after flower-sterilization in the spring and in the autumn.In Ofer, sterilized flowers failed to develop fruits in springand partially set fruit in the autumn; the fruits consistedalmost exclusively of peel tissue. It was concluded that BSIis a vegetative parthenocarpic clone, i.e., that pollinationis not required for fruit set and development.Copyright 1993,1999 Academic Press Opuntia ficus-indica, cactus pear, fruit development, parthenocarpy, pollen-tube-growth, fluorescence microscopy