首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

龙须菜体表附生细菌的几种分离方法比较
引用本文:徐永健,乐观宗,张友平. 龙须菜体表附生细菌的几种分离方法比较[J]. 微生物学报, 2007, 34(1): 0123-0126
作者姓名:徐永健  乐观宗  张友平
作者单位:宁波大学生命科学与生物工程学院 宁波 31521;宁波大学生命科学与生物工程学院 宁波 31521;宁波大学生命科学与生物工程学院 宁波 31521
基金项目:宁波市博士基金项目(No.2005A610025);; 宁波市科技项目(No.2004610028);; 宁波市自然科学基金项目(No.2006A610087)
摘    要:采用超声波粉碎法、涡旋振荡法、超声波清洗法、研磨匀浆法等4种不同的方法处理龙须菜,分离其体表的附生细菌,并对分离细菌的数量、种类、形态结构、细胞壁特性等进行了观察和分析。通过对不同方法和相间方法的不同处理所得结果比较显示,超声波清洗法和研磨匀浆法对分离细菌的数量和种类效果都较差;超声波粉碎法和涡旋振荡法效果较好,尤以超声波粉碎法的30W30s处理效果最好,该方法分离到本项目4个方法13个处理获得的16个菌株中的12个菌株,龙须菜的细菌数1.75×106cells/g。

关 键 词:海藻   龙须菜   附生细菌   分离方法

Comparison with Several Methods to Isolate Epiphytic Bacteria from Gracilaria lemaneiformis (Rhodophyta)
XU Yong-Jian,LE Guan-Zong and ZHANG You-Ping. Comparison with Several Methods to Isolate Epiphytic Bacteria from Gracilaria lemaneiformis (Rhodophyta)[J]. Acta microbiologica Sinica, 2007, 34(1): 0123-0126
Authors:XU Yong-Jian  LE Guan-Zong  ZHANG You-Ping
Affiliation:Faculty of Life Science and Biotechnology; Ningbo University; Ningbo 315211;Faculty of Life Science and Biotechnology; Ningbo University; Ningbo 315211;Faculty of Life Science and Biotechnology; Ningbo University; Ningbo 315211
Abstract:We used 4 methods,such as ultrasonic crush(UC),ultrasonic rinse(UR),whorl surge(WS)and rubbing(RU),to isolate epiphytic bacteria from red alga Gracilaria lemaneiformis.Then,we counted bacteria numbers,detected bacterial species,observed bacterial configuration and characteristic of cell wall.Compared with these methods and with different treatments in one method,the results were drawn:the UR and RU were inferior in all methods to isolate bacterial numbers and species,the UC and WS were better,especially,the treatment 30W 30s of UC was the best in experiment,which isolated 12 of 16 bacterial species,and got 1.75 106cells per gram wet weight G.lemaneiformis.
Keywords:Seaweed   Gracilaria lemaneiformi   Epiphytic bacteria   Isolation method
点击此处可从《微生物学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《微生物学报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号