Why long-lived species are more likely to be social: the role of local dominance

Recent studies have shown that individuals of species that livein groups tend to have high annual survival, but this link haslacked a theoretical explanation. We evaluate two hypothesesthat explain how longevity could have led to the evolution ofgroup living. The first is the territory inheritance hypothesis,and it proposes that longevity increases the probability ofnonbreeding subordinates surviving long enough to have the opportunityof inheriting their natal territory. Second, we propose a novelhypothesis, the reciprocal altruism hypothesis, which is thatlongevity increases local dominance by favoring nonaggressionpacts among neighboring residents because longevity increasesthe likelihood of reciprocal altruism. Birds thus accept subordinateresidency because the exclusion of nonlocal birds will meanthat, if they survive long enough, they will be likely to actuallyachieve territory inheritance. The reciprocal altruism hypothesisis supported by a wider array of evidence; becomes progressivelymore powerful as longevity increases, thus producing a positivefeedback; explains the evolution of local dominance (whereasthe territory inheritance hypothesis assumes its existence);and provides an explanation for why cooperative breeding shouldbe found more often in aseasonal environments.