Abstract: | We questioned whether the decrease inO2 consumption( O2) during hypoxia innewborns is a regulated response or reflects a limitation inO2 availability. Experiments wereconducted on previously instrumented conscious newborn dogs. O2 was measured at a warmambient temperature (30°C, n = 7)or in the cold (20°C, n = 6),while the animals breathed air or were sequentially exposed to 15 minof fractional inspired O2(FIO2): 21, 18, 15, 12, 10, 8, and 6%. In normoxia, O2 averaged 15 ± 1 (SE)and 25 ± 1 ml · kg 1 · min 1in warm and cold conditions, respectively. In the warmcondition, hypometabolism (i.e., hypoxic O2 < normoxic O2) occurred at FIO2 10%, whereas in thecold condition, hypometabolism occurred atFIO2 12%. The sameresults were obtained in a separate group(n = 14) of noninstrumented puppies.For all levels of FIO2 withhypometabolism, the relationships between measures ofO2 availability (arterialO2 saturation or content, venousPO2 or saturation,x-axis) vs. O2(y-axis) had lower slopes in warm than in coldconditions. Hence, O2 during hypometabolism in the warm condition was not the maximal attainable for the level of oxygenation. The results do not support thepossibility that the hypoxic drop in O2 in the newborn reflects a limitation in O2availability. The results are compatible with the ideathat the phenomenon is one of "regulated conformism" tohypoxia. |