|
|||||
|
|
Interpretation and Application of Article 298 of the Law of the Sea Convention in Recent Annex VII Arbitrations: An Appraisal |
|
| Authors: | Keyuan Zou Qiang Ye |
| Affiliation: | 1. Lancashire Law School, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, Lancashire, United Kingdom;2. Beijing Office, National Institute for South China Sea Studies, Haikou City, China |
| Abstract: | Article 298 of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea allows state parties to exclude certain categories of disputes from the compulsory procedures entailing binding decisions. This provision serves as a “safety valve” by excluding sensitive issues mainly related to sovereignty. This article examines the three recent Annex VII Arbitral Awards (the South China Sea Arbitration; the Arctic Sunrise Arbitration; and the Chagos Marine Protected Area Arbitration) that assessed the interpretation and application of Article 298. |
| Keywords: | Arctic Sunrise Case Chagos Arbitration compulsory procedures LOS Convention South China Sea Arbitration |