Suppression of the rotifer Polyarthra remata by the omnivorous copepod Tropocyclops extensus: predation or competition

Indirect evidence from observations in the field suggested thata common and often abundant cyclopoid copepod, Tropocyclopsextensus, despite its small size (0.5 mm) and largely algaldiet, is an important predator of the rotifer Polyarthra remata.Laboratory experiments showed that copepodids and adults, butnot nauplii, markedly suppressed the population growth of thisrotifer. The suppression could be attributed entirely to predation,rather than to exploitative competition for shared food resourcesor to interference. Mortality rates predicted from a separatefeeding-rate experiment weresufficient to account for the declinein population size observed in the Tropocyclops treatment ofculture experiments. Also, monitoring the availability of cryptomonadfood in treatments with and without Tropocyclops throughoutthese experiments showed that cryptomonad densities always remainedhigh and were just as high or significantly higher in the copepodtreatments. Furthermore, direct videographic observations ofP. remata from cultures with and without Tropocyclops demonstratedno significant differences in swimming velocity, tendency todeviate from a straight-line path, or frequency and length ofspontaneous escape responses. Per capita ingestion rates ofT. extensus on P. remata varied from 2 to 8 day^-1, were significantlyhigher for adult females than adult males or copepodids V, andincreased significantly with rotifer density. A tendency ofcopepods to have higher ingestion rates on young than adultrotifers was not significant. Copepods cultured since birthwith cryptomonads and P. remata ate significantly fewer rotifersthan those cultured only with cryptomonads; this may be explainedby a more sated condition of the former and provided no evidencefor the idea that previous experience with this rotifer mightincrease predation efficiency. The results show that T. extensusin natural communities has the potential to deplete naturalpopulations of susceptible rotifer prey. Accordingly, it mayshift the species structure of rotifer assemblages in favourof resistant species, and provide selection pressure for avoidanceresponses.