Homoeologous pairing and recombination in backcross derivatives of tomato somatic hybrids [Lycopersicon esculentum (+) L. peruvianum]

 Genomic in situ hybridization (GISH) was used to examine genome interactions in two allohexa ploid (2n=6x=72) Lycopersicon esculentum (+) L. peruvianum somatic hybrids and their seed progenies originated from subsequent backcrosses to L. esculentum. The ability of GISH to distinguish between chromatin derived from two closely related species, L. esculentum and L. peruvianum (both 2n=2x=24), allowed the precise chromosomal constitution of somatic hybrids and their backcross progenies to be unequivocally established. This enabled the interaction of species genomes to be observed at meiosis, providing clear evidence of strictly regular homoeologous pairing and the high degree of homoeologous recombination in allodiploid plants (2n=2x=24) of the BC₁ generation. In segmental allodiploids of the BC₂ and BC₃ generations, the recombinant chromosomes continued to pair with a homoeologous partner (in the absence of a homologous one), and therefore could be stably incorporated into gametes. Chiasmata were found almost exclusively in more distal, rather subterminal, chromosome segments. A considerable proportion of meiotic recombination was detected in subterminal heterochromatic regions, often involving distal euchromatin, located in close proximity. GISH also supplied information on the extent of the overall sequence homology between the genomes of L. esculentum and L. peruvianum, indicating that despite their different breeding systems, these species may not be differentiated to a high degree genetically. The present study has demonstrated that somatic hybridization between two such closely related, but sexually incompatible or difficult to cross species, provides a way of transferring genes, via homoloeogous crossing-over and recombination, across the incompatibility barriers. Indeed, such hybrids may offer the preferred route for gene transfer, which subsequently results in more stable gene introgression than other methods. Received: 22 July 1996 / Accepted: 23 August 1996