| Abstract: | In the assembly of actin filaments that takes place during the spreading of a polulation of human lung cells, after trypsin detachment off the substratum and replating, tropomyosin exhibits a considrable lag in its association with the newly forming filament bundles; it begins to associate with them during the later stages of cell spreading as the actin filament bundles normally seen in interphase cells begin to organize. This lag is evident in a number of cell types that are spreading onto a substratum; it does not appear to be due to a selective degradation of this molecule during rounding up of the cells, since tropmyosin associates with the actin filament bundles after this lag even under conditions where the protein synthetic activity of the cell is inhibited to more than 95% by cycloheximide. The preferential binding of tropomyosin to fully assembled filament bundles but not to newly formed bundles of actin filaments suggests therefore the existence of two classes of action filaments: those that bind tropomyosin and those that do not. This selective localization of tropomyosin and those that do not. This selective localization of tropomyosin on actin filaments was further pursued by examining the localization of this molecule in membrane ruffles. The immunofluorescent results indicate that ruffling is an actin-filament-dependent, microtubule-independent phenomenon. Tropomyosin is absent from membrane ruffles under a variety of circumstances where ruffling is expressed and, more generally, from any other cellular activity where actin filaments are expected to be in a dynamic state of reorganization or are required to be in a flexible configuraion. It is concluded that in tissue culture cells tropomyosin binds preferentially to actin filaments involved in structural support to confer rigidity upon them as well as aid them in maintaining a stretched phenotype. The absence of tropomyosin from certain motile phenomena where actin filaments are involved indicates that these classes of actin filaments are regulated by cytoplasmic mechanisms distinct from that by which tropomyosin (and troponin) mediates contractility in skeletal mulscle; it opens the possibility that different types of actin filaments enagaged in different cellular motile phenomenon in tissue culture cells may be regulated by a host of coexisting regulatory mechanisms, some as yet undetermined. |
